- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 63,980
- Reaction score
- 60,250
And Gal Gadot is gorgeous
Larson has better tits but that's all. Overall, Gadot walk-off KO's her
And Gal Gadot is gorgeous
Have you gone to the war room?
Place might as well be called storm front lite.
Place is filled with all sorts of unhinged individuals.
Are these entertainment industry people ever going to realize that people are sick and tired of the politics 24/7 and just was to go watch some action for a couple of hours to take the edge off.
Hulk was my favorite comic as a kid. I had comic from issue 1 thru about 300. I also had most of the original Xmen run as that was my second fav. It was sad when I gave them all to my Bro and Sis-in-law for their kids to have and they just gave them all away.
I have no idea WTF is going on in this art or what an 'Immortal Hulk' is. He changed so much from my run with WWH and WBH and others that I just can't make that leap in my head.
So . . .
Shills gonna shill and raging fanboys gonna rage?
And Gal Gadot is gorgeous
For whatever reason, Marvel doesn't have the rights to make a Hulk solo film. Having him in team-up films is okay.Hulk is my favorite hero. His movie back in 2008 or whatever is still one of the best IMO. I remember when I first saw it, it's when I knew they could really bring these characters to life now. I wish they would give him another solo movie or do something similar to Thor Raganarok except make Hulk the focus. World War Hulk would have been perfect but they kind of ruined that with Raganarok now.
There's another story line I read but I don't think it would work because it required Banner having a child with someone. Basically Hulk from another universe comes in and steals his son, Dr. Strange has to help him get to the other universe and get his son back who's full grown now by the time he reaches him. Maybe in the next phase they can do something like this.
Universal maintains the rights to a HULK-centric film. It's so stupid.For whatever reason, Marvel doesn't have the rights to make a Hulk solo film. Having him in team-up films is okay.
For whatever reason, Marvel doesn't have the rights to make a Hulk solo film. Having him in team-up films is okay.
What I didn't know until recently is that there is a team-up in the comics of Doctor Strange, Hulk, Namor and Silver Surfer called "The Defenders". That would be a cool movie down the line.
Didn’t he have a son in Planet Hulk? What’s his deal?Except it worked for Black Panther so all they learned is they can make a lot of money doing this. Although it doesn't appear to be working out so well for them here. Black people do like Marvel movies I don't feel women really care about the movies.
Hulk is my favorite hero. His movie back in 2008 or whatever is still one of the best IMO. I remember when I first saw it, it's when I knew they could really bring these characters to life now. I wish they would give him another solo movie or do something similar to Thor Raganarok except make Hulk the focus. World War Hulk would have been perfect but they kind of ruined that with Raganarok now.
There's another story line I read but I don't think it would work because it required Banner having a child with someone. Basically Hulk from another universe comes in and steals his son, Dr. Strange has to help him get to the other universe and get his son back who's full grown now by the time he reaches him. Maybe in the next phase they can do something like this.
Didn’t he have a son in Planet Hulk? What’s his deal?
They look like brother and sister to me. Perhaps sister and sister.It's also easy to come across as grounded and likable when you're sitting next to Ezra Miller.
I find it weird that since nobody really knows who Captain Marvel is prior to this movie being announced, you'd think they brink up the fact that Rogue stole her powers and that's how she can fly, be superstrong, etc.....
I get that's a Fox property or whatever, but they even had it in Xmen the Animated Series one time in her origin story.
Disney acquired Fox's film and television catalog, so presumably yes.Do the legally own Xmen yet?
Plus Rogue hadn't gotten those powers yet on the films. Would be cool if they did that in a future movie.
i'm not sure (hence the Fox comment), but i'm not even saying have it in the movie, just more a marketing/interview thing to get the character's image more out there (and not relying on Brie Larson to do that for them, as that doesn't appear to be helping haha)Do the legally own Xmen yet?
Plus Rogue hadn't gotten those powers yet on the films. Would be cool if they did that in a future movie.
Do the legally own Xmen yet?
Plus Rogue hadn't gotten those powers yet on the films. Would be cool if they did that in a future movie.
Not in Planet Hulk as far as I know. The one I read was a novel where him and (betty? generals daughter) have a baby. He's not as strong as the Hulk but he can apparently run much faster. It was a good book because the Hulk who stole the son traveled to different universes to gather most of the Hulks and take over the world. He was also incredibly Strong himself and the strongest Hulk of them all if I recall.
Wasn't his son Skaar from planet Hulk?
I think so, but like the previous reference to Adam Warlock we're not holding our breath for any follow-through.also, am I retarded or was that 'him' shiny guy at the end of uh GotG2 supposed to be implied Adam Warlock?
perhaps he comes back to help Capt Marvel?