The corruption argument makes no sense. If Canelo had won, perhaps I could see it. Even a draw. But seriously, consider it for a moment. Canelo won some rounds, right? You yourself gave him 3. I saw 5. So we could perhaps meet in the middle and say he won 4? So you're telling me judges would be willing to give him 1 round he didn't earn and lose but not give him 2 he didn't earn and escape with the draw, and the idea is they were paid off to show bias to Canelo?
Wouldn't whoever is paying off the judges be upset by this? And not only that, but all 3 judges gave Canelo ( a notoriously slow starter in most fights) the same exact rounds.
Seriously, stop listening to people spouting this silliness. The truth is Canelo came out aggressive and won some rounds. They landed the same amount of power punches and Canelo was the heavier puncher. Thats why he won those early rounds. Now if you liked Bivols workrate, thats cool. I can see that but to say the only way to get those rounds for Canelo is for all 3 judges to score rounds for Canelo that he almost always historically loses would insinuate that not only the judges agreed on this oddity pre fight but also that Canelo was in on it to and fought more aggressively than normal in the first couple of rounds and after comittng this felony they were paid for , they changed their minds and gave it to Bivol by 1 round.

The right guy won. the rest of this is sour grapes from people like Teddy Atlas and Roids.