Dr Disrespect Banned From Twitch

[KaNesDeath]

Nothing in the article about Macro said anything about him attending as a press member.

Perks he received were that of press, journalist, media or whatever verbiage someone prefers using. Which makes the whole point of that article and inclusion of sandwich within the tweet confusing. He wanted the anonymity to be fully objective an received it.

 

[Madmick]

Perks he received were that of press, journalist, media or whatever verbiage someone prefers using. Which makes the whole point of that article and inclusion of sandwich within the tweet confusing. He wanted the anonymity to be fully objective an received it.

You are simply unbearable. You just alleged he attended as a press member. When asked to cite the part of the article that said this, you instead offer an inference completely of your own delusions that isn't even implied.

Again, the article said nothing about him attending as a press member. He is specifically referred to as a "content creator".

Concession accepted.

 

[KaNesDeath]

You are simply unbearable. You just alleged he attended as a press member. When asked to cite the part of the article that said this, you instead offer an inference completely of your own delusions that isn't even implied.

He refused all forms of compensation to produce a unimpeded review. This is basic deduction.

 

[Madmick]

He refused all forms of compensation to produce a unimpeded review. This is basic deduction.

This is not how deduction works. First of all, since you have insisted there is compensation for content creators, then one could refuse compensation as a content creator. Yet without eliminating that possibility you deduced what you wanted to deduce. Because you suck at logic.

Second, a minute ago you said he attended with a press pass (offering no evidence he did) while expecting compensation of a content creator. Now you're directly contradicting that by saying he refused all forms of compensation.

If you read the article. You'd notice his intent was that of a media credential participant. While expecting the perks of a content creator credential. It doesnt work like that.

Pick a lane you blathering nitwit. Can you keep your fabrications straight for just three consecutive posts? It seems beyond you.

 

[KaNesDeath]

This is not how deduction works. First of all, since you have insisted there is compensation for content creators, then one could refuse compensation as a content creator. Yet without eliminating that possibility you deduced what you wanted to deduce. Because you suck at logic.

A gaming influencer refusing all forms of compensation to attend this type of event from the event organizer would be classified as media for the event. Way such a gaming personality typically tries an offset their content production costs is by seeking out another sponsor. Which is typically a non-compete games industry endemic sponsor.

Its a similar circumstance to when LTT visited Nvidia for a guided tour a few months back. They were invited as media with a MSI content sponsor, not Nvidia.

 

[Madmick]

A gaming influencer refusing all forms of compensation to attend this type of event from the event organizer would be classified as media for the event. Way such a gaming personality typically tries an offset their content production costs is by seeking out another sponsor. Which is typically a non-compete games industry endemic sponsor.

Its a similar circumstance to when LTT visited Nvidia for a guided tour a few months back. They were invited as media with a MSI content sponsor, not Nvidia.

You repeatedly introduce completely fabricated claims out of your ass for which you provide no evidence to substantiate your claim. Eventually, because you're not a very smart person, your can't keep your lies straight, and they end up contradicting each other.

Now that you've directly contradicted yourself, rather than address this direct contradiction, by explaining how someone could both preemptively refuse and expect compensation simultaneously, or even address the fact that you haven't substantiated the basis of your invented contradiction, by showing us that: (1) this man "Macro" attended the event as a press member, when journalistic reports explicitly say he attended as a content creator; or (2) press at the event weren't offered any courtesies (that don't even constitute a sponsorship in the first place), such as freely provided food concessions, which are pretty common at large events for attending professionals everywhere, well, what do you do?

You invent a completely new claim with no evidence to support it! No, a gaming influencer refusing all forms of compensation (while expecting compensation, LOL) does NOT indicate that person is attending as media. Another imaginary Kanefact.

I don't even know why you're talking about an LTT video. LTT visiting NVIDIA's Nyx data center upon the special invitation of NVIDIA for an exclusive tour isn't a game launch event, and not remotely similar for the simple reason nobody else is attending, so how would LTT arrive with a special badge as a "content creator" instead?

 

[KaNesDeath]

I don't even know why you're talking about an LTT video. LTT visiting NVIDIA's Nyx data center upon the special invitation of NVIDIA for an exclusive tour isn't a game launch event, and not remotely similar for the simple reason nobody else is attending, so how would LTT arrive with a special badge as a "content creator" instead?

Your understanding of this industry isnt there. For parallels and cross sections exist between credential classifications per FTC social media disclosure guidelines.

A social media media outlet can accept travel expenses from the event organizer and not be deemed a sponsor. That social media media outlet must disclose that travel expense coverage in their content though. Unlike how a White House press pool reporter on Air Force One doesnt need to disclose their flight accommodation.

 

[Madmick]

Your understanding of this industry isnt there. For parallels and cross sections exist between credential classifications per FTC social media disclosure guidelines.

A social media outlet can accept travel expenses from the event organizer and not be deemed a sponsor. That social media media outlet must disclose that travel expense coverage in their content though. Unlike how a White House press pool reporter on Air Force One doesnt need to disclose their flight accommodation.

More imaginary bullshit; more contradictions of prior imaginary claims. More evasion dodging plain questions about a statement that was just made.

You're like a child who wandered into the middle of a movie if life itself was the conversation, Donnie.

 

[KaNesDeath]

Dr Disrespect Says His Fake Highguard Preview Badge Photo Was Just 'Poking Fun' After Dev Confirms He Was Not Invited to Play Early - IGN

The developer of Highguard has confirmed streamer Dr Disrespect did not attend a preview event after he created a fake badge and pretended to have been invited to play the game early. Dr Disrespect responded to say he was "poking fun."

www.ign.com

His response to the fabrication:

Dr Disrespect said on-stream: “‘Last week we took the Lambo to LA to check out #HighGuard.’ That's all we said. Did we say we went to the event? Did we say we got hands on? Did I say I was going to give you my review and feedback today? Huh? Did we say we were going to give our feedback and review today? ‘We got hands-on Highguard.’ Did I say that? Did we play the game? No. We just put together a photo poking fun. All these f***ing people took it seriously. Holy s**t. How brain dead is this f***ing industry? How stupid is this industry?”

Dr Disrespect went on to hit out at his critics, defend his current brand, and insist he remains relevant.

On brand response with his fellow Rumble creators.

 

[KaNesDeath]

Looking unhinged:

 

[Wrath of Foamy]

Post pics of sandwich.