Social Canadian Nurses instructed to reject "White European Medicine" via new Code of Ethics

Good lord, @Lycandroid . If being dramatic, hysterical abd terrified were a medical condition, you should be triaged to the very front of the line, regardless of your ethnicity, existing beliefs or cultural background.

So, you should actually be in support of this. It protects your ...let's say, "strange" manner of interpreting things from medical malpractice.
 
BEAST said:
I already wrote my response here

Nothing in that entire thing states "Put Somalians and Natives ahead of white people".

You're making up boogeymen in your mind, like all insane far-right 'Bertan tards.
Get off FB and rumble.com for a day and touch grass.
Click to expand...
Your answer of having to do a land acknowledgement does not answer the question of whether or not you think a left wing ideology should be enforced within our healthcare system and whether or not adherence to should determine your employment

Not making anything up, I was citing personal experience.
Damien Karras said:
TS sounds like a member of Diagonal
Click to expand...
Go cry nazi somewhere else. I am against our healthcare system becoming a politicized organization. Providing care should be the primary function not advancing an ideology.
HomeCheese said:
What I have asked you but you never answer, what is woke or left wing about the social determinants of health?

Shouldn't ones environment be considered when making a diagnosis? Like, someone with chronic congestion and migraines might actually be suffering from mold due to substandard housing. The prescription to solve their issue would involve some sort of community body that polices slum lords.

You see, it's not complicated and it's actually cheeper on the healthcare system when these factors are considered. For example, they don't need an MRI wIth a diagnosis like this.
Click to expand...
I did answer that and I will give you that same answer, if you are using a woke left wing ideology to determine what the social determinants of health actually are, you will make determinations that are not factual. When you make policy based on a false premise you will end up with worse outcomes and people will suffer.

This will make things MORE expensive as you will not be efficiently treating patients.
GreatSaintGuillotine said:
Ok. Read through this again. It's literally just a reminder not to violate a patient's right to refuse treatment and not be a dick about it. Pretty standard stuff and it doesn't change anything. It boils down to "be respectful and don't get us sued over some racist shit". You still use standard practice. Still recommend it. But if they exercise their right to refuse treatment, don't be a cunt.

I don't understand how OP came to this conclusion. In the most respectful way possible, it seems like he misread something and is not looking to be corrected.
Click to expand...
You are lying, I have posted excerpts from the guide that prove you are lying.
 
jeremyemilio said:
Funny thing is, my opinion on the matter you've raised in this thread will get me labelled a woke lefty loon.
Click to expand...

I have disagreed with your positions on occasion but have always admired how you expressed them.

If I had to label you the best I could ever do is "moderate". You don't ever seem ideological or cemented to any partisan bias.
 
Lycandroid said:
You are lying, I have posted excerpts from the guide that prove you are lylying.
Click to expand...
I'm really not. I haven't read all your posts but I read the whole thing twice. I'm not trying to be a dick to you bro. I'm being real with you.

You are making claims that are not present in the article
 
GreatSaintGuillotine said:
I'm really not. I haven't read all your posts but I read the whole thing twice. I'm not trying to be a dick to you bro. I'm being real with you.

You are making claims that are not present in the article
Click to expand...
reread the updated OP
 
Lycandroid said:
reread the updated OP
Click to expand...
You just pasted the from the link. I read that man. Multiple times. Idk what you're looking at to make you jump to this conclusion. This covers

1) patients rights to refuse treatment which has always been a thing

2) treating patients with respect for their decision which, again is standard practice

3) directing medical staff to be aware of the types of requests they will come across

4) establishing an environment where natives will feel more comfortable accepting western treatments


I can only assume you're angry about DEI, race, inequality, etc. being mentioned but that isn't what you said was the issue. You said theyre rejecting White Euro medicine which is not at all the case.

If you revise the topic to something along the lines of "nurses told to do diversity training" then no one could argue otherwise
 
Lycandroid said:
Your answer of having to do a land acknowledgement does not answer the question of whether or not you think a left wing ideology should be enforced within our healthcare system and whether or not adherence to should determine your employment

Not making anything up, I was citing personal experience.

Go cry nazi somewhere else. I am against our healthcare system becoming a politicized organization. Providing care should be the primary function not advancing an ideology.

I did answer that and I will give you that same answer, if you are using a woke left wing ideology to determine what the social determinants of health actually are, you will make determinations that are not factual. When you make policy based on a false premise you will end up with worse outcomes and people will suffer.

This will make things MORE expensive as you will not be efficiently treating patients.

You are lying, I have posted excerpts from the guide that prove you are lying.
Click to expand...
What is woke and left wing about the social determinants of health? How does this lead to non factual determination? What do you even mean with this? Give us an example.

What is the false premise?
 
I’d like to point out that the Canadian Nurses Association is merely a professional association, not a regulatory body. Membership is voluntary and it has no role in the governance or oversight of Canadian nurses. Nurses, along with all other regulated professions, are regulated at the provincial level.
 
oldshadow said:
Next are they going to start putting the sick and elderly out in the woods to die as was traditional in many tribes.

Not even sure what this means, can someone from there explain it.
Click to expand...
In ancient Japan there is a myth about ubasute
 
Law Talkin’ Guy said:
I’d like to point out that the Canadian Nurses Association is merely a professional association, not a regulatory body. Membership is voluntary and it has no role in the governance or oversight of Canadian nurses. Nurses, along with all other regulated professions, are regulated at the provincial level.
Click to expand...
Don´t be a buzzkill with facts and shit when the TS has a great rage boner going.
 
This thread hasn't turned out the way you wanted has it TS? Don't ragequit like your buddy did this week, lie down, have a cookie, it will be alright..
 
KAZSoliloquy said:
it's woke to acknowledge that first nations people exist.
Click to expand...
Seriously? When you see "social determinants of health" you automatically think it's about native Americans?

Further, how is it woke to acknowledge their existence?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,208
Messages
57,974,506
Members
175,888
Latest member
whatsername

Share this page

Back
Top