• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

International Canadian Liberals confusingly scrap carbon tax they created

rikibobby said:
Why wouldn't he be granted it. List some reasons oh wise one.
Click to expand...

Such a ridiculous notion. He's been a MP for nearly 20 years, a PS and Cabinet minister. Harper instituted mandatory comprehensive background checks every 2 years for all conservative MP since 2008. The security clearance was for one specific topic which he refused due to conflict of interest due to being leader of the opposition

It's just soybased wishful thinking from the left
 
Ares Black said:
That's because you are a fool

Great idea. Who need national security anyway?

Of course. Because I am not a moron.

I don't think you know anything at all about good governance.
Click to expand...
You have answered this question: If you were to craft the nondisclosure agreement would it expire upon becoming prime minister?

negatively. You cannot explain how this amounts to good governance as opposed to a disgraceful Canadian version of proactive pardons. Having no argument, you have moved on to insults. Will you admit it?
 
gatchaman said:
You have answered this question: If you were to craft the nondisclosure agreement would it expire upon becoming prime minister?

negatively.
Click to expand...
Yes, because I am not a moron and I understand how the Canadian government works.

The Prime Minister is a public servant. He should not have the power to undermine national security.
gatchaman said:
You cannot explain how this amounts to good governance as opposed to a disgraceful Canadian version of proactive pardons.
Click to expand...
How does revealing classified information to the general public equal good governance?
gatchaman said:
Having no argument, you have moved on to insults. Will you admit it?
Click to expand...
It's you who has no argument.

Why do you think you are entitled to know classified information?
 
Ares Black said:
Yes, because I am not a moron and I understand how the Canadian government works.

The Prime Minister is a public servant. He should not have the power to undermine national security.

How does revealing classified information to the general public equal good governance?

It's you who has no argument.

Why do you think you are entitled to know classified information?
Click to expand...
Your understanding is that an anonymous CSIS clerk should be the arbiter of what the prime minister can say to the public. But since the prime minister appoints the head of CSIS through the federal cabinet, which he also appoints, it is clearly not the case that an anonymous CSIS permits the speech of the prime minister.

Since I'm paying for this government, I think that I the taxpayer is entitled to know what my government is up to. Should the JFK files be released now, unredacted in accordance with the law?

Does a nondisclosure agreement for Pollievre, which does not expire on becoming prime minister (which you support), create the possibility of obstructing future criminal prosecution of acting politicians?
 
gatchaman said:
Your understanding is that an anonymous CSIS clerk should be the arbiter of what the prime minister can say to the public. But since the prime minister appoints the head of CSIS through the federal cabinet, which he also appoints, it is clearly not the case that an anonymous CSIS permits the speech of the prime minister.
Click to expand...
You really have no idea how the world works, do you?
gatchaman said:
Since I'm paying for this government, I think that I the taxpayer is entitled to know what my government is up to. Should the JFK files be released now, unredacted in accordance with the law?
Click to expand...
You are not paying for this government. It is not your government. You are not entirely to know classified national security information.
gatchaman said:
Does a nondisclosure agreement for Pollievre, which does not expire on becoming prime minister (which you support), create the possibility of obstructing future criminal prosecution of acting politicians?
Click to expand...
No, because it is not his job to pursue the prosecution of political rivals. It is his job to serve the people of Canada.
 
Ares Black said:
You really have no idea how the world works, do you?

You are not paying for this government. It is not your government. You are not entirely to know classified national security information.

No, because it is not his job to pursue the prosecution of political rivals. It is his job to serve the people of Canada.
Click to expand...
You have leveled the insult of ignorance without providing any information yourself. Does the prime minister appoint the head of CSIS through the federal cabinet, which he also appoints?

The government creates no product and thus subsists entirely on tax money. What is paying for my government if not tax money?

Here are some entirely plausible scenarios:
1) Trudeau and Mckenna distributed tens of billions of tax dollars to friends and family under an infrastructure plan without any infrastructure to show for it.
2) Trudeau conspired with the Chinese to expose Canadian troops to Covid-19 at the World Military Games.
3) Trudeau sold bioweapon viruses from the Winnipeg lab to the Chinese.
If Pollievre were to reveal any of this, resulting in prosecution by the RCMP, would this be better described as:
a) prosecuting political rivals?
b) serving the people of Canada?
 
gatchaman said:
You have leveled the insult of ignorance without providing any information yourself. Does the prime minister appoint the head of CSIS through the federal cabinet, which he also appoints?

The government creates no product and thus subsists entirely on tax money. What is paying for my government if not tax money?

Here are some entirely plausible scenarios:
1) Trudeau and Mckenna distributed tens of billions of tax dollars to friends and family under an infrastructure plan without any infrastructure to show for it.
2) Trudeau conspired with the Chinese to expose Canadian troops to Covid-19 at the World Military Games.
3) Trudeau sold bioweapon viruses from the Winnipeg lab to the Chinese.
If Pollievre were to reveal any of this, resulting in prosecution by the RCMP, would this be better described as:
a) prosecuting political rivals?
b) serving the people of Canada?
Click to expand...
"entirely plausible scenarios"

Lol, we're done here
 
Poilievre has gone radio silent since the orange Dump took office. Not sure what their strategy is. What a collapse.

Would be nuts if Libs won a dominant victory in next election. End of the day, I'm taking Carney 10/10 times over that fucking clown drama teacher we just embarrassingly put front and center for a decade.
 
@Ares Black Why did you ignore my post about Mulcair not getting the same security clearance when he was in opposition ? Why do you ignore the former leader of your favorite party saying that is a non issue ?

Anyway it's going to be interesting to see how the liberal media is going to smear Pierre saying he will sell us out to Trump and he is a MAGA candidate when Trump just came out and endorsed Carney and said he doesn't like Pierre for his failure to kiss his ass.

Funny how that was the biggest attack against Pierre and what caused him to drop in the polls turns out to be a complete fabrication made by the media to bolster the Liberals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,260,824
Messages
57,055,118
Members
175,522
Latest member
noeltz1900

Share this page

Back
Top