- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 3,566
- Reaction score
- 1,028
So here we are again, and a jury has once again let a white man walk free after being charged with a crime against a Native. This follows closely on the heels of the Colton Boushie case which saw Geralt Stanley - a white farmer - walk free after accidentally killing Boushie.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/raymond-cormier-trial-verdict-tina-fontaine-1.4542319
In this case, a white man was accused of murdering a native teenager. Instead of giving the details of the case, here's why he walked:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/raymond-cormier-acquittal-tina-fontaine-1.4548210
Recap: There was never a good chance of conviction, since the evidence was extremely circumstantial and inconclusive.
You'd think that this is a sign our justice system is working, i.e. someone is charged with a crime and the prosecution can only produce sub-par evidence, the accused walks free. But apparently it's a sign the justice system is in a deep state of disrepair, according mainly to people who aren't lawyers or judges and apparently have a hard time grasping the concept of 'reasonable doubt'.
TLDR: Canadian justice system is doing what it should, does not take feelings into consideration, only facts, is apparently broken because of this, because facts are only valuable when they're congruent with your feelings and your incomplete knowledge of circumstances and details of subsequent legal proceedings.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/raymond-cormier-trial-verdict-tina-fontaine-1.4542319
In this case, a white man was accused of murdering a native teenager. Instead of giving the details of the case, here's why he walked:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/raymond-cormier-acquittal-tina-fontaine-1.4548210
Recap: There was never a good chance of conviction, since the evidence was extremely circumstantial and inconclusive.
You'd think that this is a sign our justice system is working, i.e. someone is charged with a crime and the prosecution can only produce sub-par evidence, the accused walks free. But apparently it's a sign the justice system is in a deep state of disrepair, according mainly to people who aren't lawyers or judges and apparently have a hard time grasping the concept of 'reasonable doubt'.
TLDR: Canadian justice system is doing what it should, does not take feelings into consideration, only facts, is apparently broken because of this, because facts are only valuable when they're congruent with your feelings and your incomplete knowledge of circumstances and details of subsequent legal proceedings.