@goldennirvana I said I wasn't going to explain all this to you because I thought you were trolling but I believe now you're just simple. Sorry. Here's a full response to you posts ITT subsequent to that.
You said you weren't going to respond because you had no counter-argument, and nothing's changed.
So, my bad I was on my phone and in a hurry
What does you being on your phone have to do with you making such a spectacular mistake?
and made an error in fact but it didn't impact my argument
Erm... yeah, it absolutely impacted your argument because you were arguing about landmass. You said New Brunswick is much larger than it really is.
whereas your followup post, above, strengthens my argument. Instead of France, let's take Austria which is around the same area but has 10 times the population, with much of the area being mountains. Or how about you try and tell me how many people you think can comfortably live in ~73k km^2, which is what, 0.7% of the total area? Lots more where that came from.
Again, all this is irrelevant because you're talking about one single Canadian province (3rd smallest in Canada). My point was that most of Canada is uninhabitable, and the issue with overpopulation actually isn't even about landmass, it's about resources.
Canada is on the same latitudes as most of Europe. Calgary is the same latitude as London, UK. Most of Canada has pretty decent summers that are warmer than 60°F on average. Just because fewer people live farther from the border doesn't mean they can't. Why should it be developed until it is needed?
You're really proving how little you know about climate now. There's more to climate than just north & south. Continental airflow, altitude, ocean currents, proximity to water etc etc all play a role in the climate.
Good luck trying to get lots of people to live in a province like Nunavut.
On the subject of accusations of racism, you complained that failing other arguments (which was not the case) was the reason for the post. Not correct. In that post, I was very clear about how I defined a racist in this context and I challenge you to show me how it is not. I said,
Babble. What you came out with was the internet version of diarrhea. You completely lost your cool and resorted to SJWism 101: accuse your opponent of being a racist because you have no counter-argument.
I never once mentioned "brown people", for one. You had to resort to a strawman because you have nothing. You also lost your cool so badly you said that complaining about overpopulation is racist. LOL
Do you contend otherwise? Do you think the country will for sure go downhill just because too many of its citizens have brown skin?
The fact you'd even ask me such a question speaks volumes. You are a moron.
Because that is what the knob I quoted implied, and I said if you believe that, you're a racist.
So SOMEONE ELSE said that... but you're attributing it to me? Are you fucking serious?
Then I said if you think Canada doesn't have available habitable area by the metric fuckton, you're stupid.
Again, overpopulation is about RESOURCES, not landmass.
If you believe both at the same time you're a stupid racist. Logic, motherfucker. Keep the idiot accusations to the guy in the mirror.
Now go get your fucking shinebox.
ROFL
