At the time Cummins was undefeated in MMA, and his last MMA bout was only 9 months prior. Plenty of active UFC fighters have day jobs and longer breaks than that between fights. It was short-notice and DC wasn't champion at the time.
We have a weird situation where Pereira is potentially a bad matchup for the champion (simply because Izzy has never used offensive grappling in MMA) but is unranked and totally unproven against top grapplers in the division. He could easily lose to Vettori, Brunson, Andre Muniz, Hermansson, Weidman etc. if they can take him down. He doesn't deserve to fight for the belt unless he shows he at least has championship-level TDD.
There are plenty of unranked grapplers in the division who might even be able to beat Pereira. Guys like Nick Maximov, Albert Duraev, Gregory Rodrigues, Anthony Hernandez, Rodolfo Vieira, Jacob Malkoun, Kyle Daukaus, Deron Winn, and Gerald Meerschaert.
For all we know, Misha Cirkunov on a 3-fight losing streak might be able to tap Pereira.
Izzy had to get through Vettori, Brunson, and Gastelum just to win an interim belt. Pereira's best win in MMA is Andreas Michailidis.
again with these posts that are not only misleading, but right down asinine.
yes, Pat Cummins was "unbeaten". How many fights? 4. Each one with a different promotion.
That shows he was not "just like an UFC fighter who takes a day job to supplement his/her income".
At the time, he was not a fighter, not signed with ANY promotion and not looking for a fight. he was a full time Barista!
Now let me prop Alex like you did Pat:
Alex has 20% more MMA fights than Pat had, and he is on the same 4 fights win-streak that Pat was when he received the call to fight DC...but Alex is already signed with the UFC, making this whole thing a lot more easier.
Continuing with the same type of dishonest/deceiving headlines, it is worth mentioning that Alex is also undefeated in pro-boxing (one fight), showing he is truly a mixed martial arts legend!!
But wait! There's more!!!
Alex also got "Performance of the Night" in
all of his UFC fights, showing he is an exciting fighter. Oh, by the way, all of his wins are (T)KO's!!!
Should we continue with this rather ...dishonest posting or have a proved my point it is useless and only contributes to clouding the discussion?
Look, I do agree that he could "potentially" lose to all the ranked fighters in his division... as could Joe Sotto, but yet he fought for TJ's belt right off the bat as his first UFC fight.
But beyond that, what exactly are you trying to argue? That he does not deserve it? I clearly noted on my early posts that I do agree with it and further noted that
he should climb the ladder properly, proving his worth before fighting Israel...so again, what you are trying to argue here?
My ONLY point was that the UFC does a lot of things for the sake of a storyline, for the sake of profit... including (and unfortunately VERY commonly) giving undeserving title shots just for the sake of and easy storyline to sell.
That's how Masvidal got his two shots! That's how Colby got his two shots as well. That's how Dana is not opposed to give fucking Conor another title shot, even though he LOST his previous 3 fights in the division.
So again, please explain to me how I am wrong in pointing out that,
if Israel wanted this fight, he would have gotten it. And who really deserves this fight instead? Cannonier (who lost to Whittaker a little over a year ago?) Or perhaps cringy Strickland? It is fairly obvious that the UFC is not behind those guys.
And since I am explaining how UFC's greed has no limits and how they don't care for "deserving", please tell me why they would not make it if Israel was demanding this fight.
nah. They would. in a heartbeat.
It is only because Israel does not want this fight, that it does not happen.