Cain Velasquez Trial for Attempted Murder Expected to Begin in January

Verdict


  • Total voters
    453
i love the suggestions from some people in this thread for Cain to get probation and community service and having to take firearm safety courses.
i dont think he should see much jailtime at all considering the circumstances, but he definitely has to answer for shooting someone that was not the chomo he intended to shoot.
the judge initially refusing bail because he was a "danger to others" should go take a bath with a toaster.
 
i love the suggestions from some people in this thread for Cain to get probation and community service and having to take firearm safety courses.
i dont think he should see much jailtime at all considering the circumstances, but he definitely has to answer for shooting someone that was not the chomo he intended to shoot.
the judge initially refusing bail because he was a "danger to others" should go take a bath with a toaster.
The judge initially refused bail because Cain's "supporters" threatened her life.
 
He is free.
Not free of the charges and you knew what I meant but instead of actually responding with something quality or useful you choose to respond with garbage.

Did it make you feel better, that "GOTCHA" moment? Did that make your life seem less empty, less useless?

Of course it fucking didn't.
 
The fact is, most of the people supporting Cain say things like "I would have done the same thing," but that's just false. Normal people would not drive down the freeway firing off shots at another vehicle. I get the sentiment of being morally supportive of avenging a crime against a child, but that didn't even occur here.

If Cain suspected this crime occurred and the father of the perp was protecting the chomo, he could have done this in a manner where bystanders were not going to be struck by bullets or risk being struck by bullets. It's hard enough to accurately shoot in general, but while driving down a freeway at a moving vehicle etc. etc., so many variables at play at BEST Cain is guilty of danger to the public crimes. The fact that he hit the father instead of the actual chomo just shows general disregard for all things public safety or reasonability.

If Cain murdered the alleged chomo, then he deals with the consequences. As it stands he accomplished nothing of value other than getting himself what will probably be pretty considerable sentencing for giving an alleged protector of a chomo (his son) a flesh wound and potential access to Cain's financials for damages.

This is an all around fucked up case, but Cain did himself no favors here.

In the eyes of American law, he’s very guilty.

In the eyes of fathers, men, anyone normal, Cain did the right thing without a shadow of doubt.

True catch 22 here.

Um, no. He acted like an absolute retard. Would I want to murder a man who touched my child? Absolutely. Would I use the opportunity to get myself incarcerated, ruin my child's life, and fail at actually extracting revenge? I fucking hope not.
 
Not free of the charges and you knew what I meant but instead of actually responding with something quality or useful you choose to respond with garbage.

Did it make you feel better, that "GOTCHA" moment? Did that make your life seem less empty, less useless?

Of course it fucking didn't.

“You know what I meant” is a phrase uttered by morons who can’t accurately articulate what they want to actually say.
 
Getting raped?
The accusations is that the man has looked at and/or touched the boys penis in an inappropriate way.
Accusations because he hasn't even been to trial.
The man says that his mother (the owner of the child care center) has asked him to help the boy in the bathroom a few times since the boy was peeing all over the floor.
No other children at the center, past or present, has ever accused him of anything. He has no record of any :eek::eek::eek::eek: crime and the police has found no child porn pics or videos in his possessions. That would be quite unusual for a real :eek::eek::eek::eek: in his 40's.

Don't touch boys that way, simple.
 
Yes he absolutely hit someone. It’s mind boggling how many people with opinions are actually clueless about the case.
My mistake. In my defense I did read several articles and it was never mentioned. The media cleverly left that out and took the narrative of a dad who only targeted the :eek::eek::eek::eek:.

Again, my mistake, I change my opinion tenfold. Peace sherbro.
 
Cain always lookin like that Nice guy just on the verge of psychopathic slip into homicide

images


"..keep pushin Beeb....."

@froggyluv , still waiting on those powerball numbers Bro
 
I’d say the most appalling development is that he’s a pretty bad shot and really needs to work on tightening those groups in the future.
 
They aledged :eek::eek::eek::eek: trial is still pending. There were 24 or so children in that kindergarten and they have been interviewing most of them. But nobody had come forward with similar allegations from what I have read; and the :eek::eek::eek::eek: has no prior history.

I have a feeing delaying Cain’s trial might be dangerous.
 
They aledged :eek::eek::eek::eek: trial is still pending. There were 24 or so children in that kindergarten and they have been interviewing most of them. But nobody had come forward with similar allegations from what I have read; and the :eek::eek::eek::eek: has no prior history.

I have a feeing delaying Cain’s trial might be dangerous.

Whether or not Goularte is guilty should legally be irrelevant to Cain’s case. It matters for public opinion, but if the courts do it’s job, should be irrelevant to Cain’s case.
 
Are we sure he shot the “wrong” person? Perhaps there is more at play. Maybe the stepdad was well aware of what was going on and that will be revealed in the trial.

I am not saying Cain shouldn’t do time, but rather that the indiscriminate fire was due to information we aren’t privy too yet.
Are we sure either of them was a :eek::eek::eek::eek:? I think we have a legal system so facts can come out.
 
The fact is, most of the people supporting Cain say things like "I would have done the same thing," but that's just false. Normal people would not drive down the freeway firing off shots at another vehicle. I get the sentiment of being morally supportive of avenging a crime against a child, but that didn't even occur here.

If Cain suspected this crime occurred and the father of the perp was protecting the chomo, he could have done this in a manner where bystanders were not going to be struck by bullets or risk being struck by bullets. It's hard enough to accurately shoot in general, but while driving down a freeway at a moving vehicle etc. etc., so many variables at play at BEST Cain is guilty of danger to the public crimes. The fact that he hit the father instead of the actual chomo just shows general disregard for all things public safety or reasonability.

If Cain murdered the alleged chomo, then he deals with the consequences. As it stands he accomplished nothing of value other than getting himself what will probably be pretty considerable sentencing for giving an alleged protector of a chomo (his son) a flesh wound and potential access to Cain's financials for damages.

This is an all around fucked up case, but Cain did himself no favors here.



Um, no. He acted like an absolute retard. Would I want to murder a man who touched my child? Absolutely. Would I use the opportunity to get myself incarcerated, ruin my child's life, and fail at actually extracting revenge? I fucking hope not.

I would kill someone to protect my child, I wouldn’t kill someone just for revenge for damaging my child.

One of them is being a good day, the other one is just being a emotional selfish prick who can’t control their anger.
 
The fact is, most of the people supporting Cain say things like "I would have done the same thing," but that's just false. Normal people would not drive down the freeway firing off shots at another vehicle. I get the sentiment of being morally supportive of avenging a crime against a child, but that didn't even occur here.

If Cain suspected this crime occurred and the father of the perp was protecting the chomo, he could have done this in a manner where bystanders were not going to be struck by bullets or risk being struck by bullets. It's hard enough to accurately shoot in general, but while driving down a freeway at a moving vehicle etc. etc., so many variables at play at BEST Cain is guilty of danger to the public crimes. The fact that he hit the father instead of the actual chomo just shows general disregard for all things public safety or reasonability.

If Cain murdered the alleged chomo, then he deals with the consequences. As it stands he accomplished nothing of value other than getting himself what will probably be pretty considerable sentencing for giving an alleged protector of a chomo (his son) a flesh wound and potential access to Cain's financials for damages.

This is an all around fucked up case, but Cain did himself no favors here.



Um, no. He acted like an absolute retard. Would I want to murder a man who touched my child? Absolutely. Would I use the opportunity to get myself incarcerated, ruin my child's life, and fail at actually extracting revenge? I fucking hope not.

Huge difference between protection and revenge. You sound like you are proud of revenge. Revenge is evil, no matter the reason.
 
How do you know he touched boys that way?

I guess we will have to wait and see but my point is that in this day and age everyone needs to be extra careful. Why the fuck would someone help a kid pee by holding is dick? A kid can't make this shit up dude. It is far too precise.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,306
Messages
58,275,477
Members
175,990
Latest member
gorakk
Back
Top