What is the point of posting this? Are you trying to lend credence to what Bryce was saying?The Institute was headed by Magnus Hirschfeld, who since 1897 had run the world's first homosexual organization Wissenschaftlich-humanitäres Komitee(Scientific-Humanitarian Committee), which campaigned on progressive and rationalgrounds for LGBT rights and tolerance at the start of the first homosexual movement that would flourish in interwar Weimar culture.
![]()
No one is saying Bryce should be locked up but there's also nothing wrong with shunning people with heinous ideas like what Bryce is saying.The problem is the draconian enforcement of ideals and history. Having the power of the narrative is precisely how the nszis enforced and gained their power. Your concept is great because it aligns with yours ( and mine ) version of history. It doesnt mean that very same logic wont be aligned with heinous or stupid ideas at a later date. . Ie slavery. Flatearth . Blasphemy etc etc.
Hes a dumbass and clearly wrong obviously and its a simple debunk. Let him speak . Trying to silence stupidity only gives it more value . And eventually things that are " certainties" in our history and idealogy shift. ( eugenics evolution flatearth colonization etc etc )
Im not confident enough that we'vee got it all figured out yet to the point we refuse to allow questions and a different opinion ( as stupid as i find his individually) he gets punched in the head for a living afterall.
Let all the dumbasses openly gather and discuss the stupidity at least we'll all know who they are hah
If the UFC decided to cut him to protect their brand or their bottom line that would be one thing. But for people from afar, with no connection or stake in the company, wanting to see Bryce cut simply to be punished for offensive opinions...well that's just completely ridiculous. Ironically, censoring people and destroying their livelihoods over personal opinions is more in line with Nazis than anything.
Punishing Bryce for his statements about Hitler is way more dangerous to society than his actual statements
Yeah Strickland's response was pretty interesting. I see a lot of YouTube "media outlets" falsely click baiting it as support for human dumpster Bryce Mitchell. But it definitely wasn't.I saw a response from Sean Strickland about this and when Sean Strickland is the voice of reason between those two people you know there's a problem here. On a side note, there should be plenty of confidence that Nazi's are shit human beings and Hitler was a terrible human being.
How is holocaust denial “impactful”?I don’t think it’s more impactful than holocaust denial
Dana is pretty much just a figurehead. It's not Dana, Frank, and Lorenzo running things anymore. It's Dana and a whole squad of other executives making decisions. You just can't compare the UFC from 15ish years ago to the UFC of now. There's been some massive changes.Yeah Strickland's response was pretty interesting. I see a lot of YouTube "media outlets" falsely click baiting it as support for human dumpster Bryce Mitchell. But it definitely wasn't.
I dont know if Strickland had a ghost writer for that or if he's just the ultimate counter culture contrararian. When things start getting popular he seems to start shit talking them. Lol
But in a way I thought it was probably better than Dana's response.
Strickland even took shots at MAGA & is letting people know that's how the hate rabbit hole starts.
Dana would never ever do that.
I could understand Dana not punishing fighters for hate speech if he didn't shelf or ruin fighter's careers simply for less & buisness disagreements.
Mitchell has his place in the UFC but he has a hard line stance on NEVER letting Francis back. That's fkn ridiculous. Lol
How is holocaust denial “impactful”?
You think people have to hate a particular group to question historical narratives?By championing a debunked and false narrative with the intent to forward CTs that push forward hatred of a particular group.
Yeah just read that. Yeah guess there was no free speech for him there. And you are right. He was better than Bryce. Who is Michael Towers? I can't find him
I like Bryce, he's genuine in spite of others judgement. He's a guy who's seeking and learning and he's putting his money where his mouth is.
You think people have to hate a particular group to question historical narratives?
He isn't seeking and learning? What do you know about him to find my post humorous?This post is hilarious. I can't tell with the Doink picture if this is a joke or not. I hope so because this statement is funny.
He's a guy who's seeking and learning.......![]()
lol you just bs now.People think it was worse with the Jews because in that case they were doing it to their own citizens.
The love of money is the root of all evil. That has never changed. Re: the bold, you can if you have any morals.You can't compare Miguel Torres with a ranked fighter. You also can't compare the UFC of now to the UFC of then. There's been many changes within the UFC since that time.
Dana still makes the decisions that's why he's still there. Thats what most smart organizations do who buy a thriving buisness. They keep on & differ to the talent who built it. They would be silly not to. As much as I dont like Dana White to some extent, one would have to be a complete fool to not give him credit as probably the only guy who could of built what he built.Dana is pretty much just a figurehead. It's not Dana, Frank, and Lorenzo running things anymore. It's Dana and a whole squad of other executives making decisions. You just can't compare the UFC from 15ish years ago to the UFC of now. There's been some massive changes.
lol you just bs now.
Corporations aren't individual human beings. You expect those to have morals?The love of money is the root of all evil. That has never changed. Re: the bold, you can if you have any morals.
I don't think Dana plays as big of a role as you think right now at this stage of his career. I think Hunter Campbell, his number 2 behind the scenes, is running the day to day business and making most of the final calls. Of course though, Dana and Hunter get along and conversate on what's best for the UFC.Dana still makes the decisions that's why he's still there. Thats what most smart organizations do who buy a thriving buisness. They keep on & differ to the talent who built it. They would be silly not to. As much as I dont like Dana White to some extent, one would have to be a complete fool to not give him credit as probably the only guy who could of built what he built.
Can Ari & WME execs have the final say? Yes
Are they involved in the up to the min granularity of roster management? No. Works like everyone corporate structure.
Is Dana steering the ship & still making the calls at this level? 100% Thats why he's still there.
If it were up to WME making the calls they would have NO problem cutting Bryce lol. The decision is out of Dana's mouth and follows his policy for the history of the UFC for fighters saying racist bullshit.
Answering a question with a question…What is the purpose of denying the holocaust and comments like Bryce’s?