Bruce has the best movie overall with Die Hard, and he can arguably have the better catalog of movies which I don't think he does. He's still not in the same universe as Denzel when it comes to acting.
He's fantastic in 1408Cage and bruce used to be in good movies
Cusack is a can who was in teen hearthrob movies
Denzel and it's a KO.
Bruce Willis has been a joke for a decade and Denzel is still making big movies and getting Oscar nominations. Willis makes the same kind of movies as Steven Seagal and John Cusack now. Shit that shouldn't even make it to Netflix.
If you want to compare 1985-2000 or so, then there's something to talk about. But Denzel had another 20 great years and Bruce just withered away. A long time ago, arguably 20 years ago.
Career Length should not be a tie on that graph. Bruce gets almost no credit for the last 10 years.
Well Nicolas Cage is pretty much another Bruce Willis. So is John Cusack. Bringing up Nicolas Cage as a comparable serves to bury Bruce, not exonerate him.
Admittedly, Denzel has a more impressive body of work, but Bruce wins just for Die Hard alone.View attachment 778419
Who do you prefer? Who do you think is better?
I love both of these guys, to me they're both legends of cinema. And I find them very comparable. They're both damn good actors, they both have done a wide range of roles. They're both known for their certain personality and charm that they bring to the screen. These aren't chameleon actors, they're not the type of actors who get lost in becoming a role, or who change themselves dramatically for a specific character. Instead, they are the character. They're the type of actors who movie makers have in mind when writing a role. And it's because people love the charm they bring to a movie, it's something very difficult to replicate.
Anyways, enough nut hugging, who do you like better? I made a quick graph of their actor stats, and where I think each fall in those categories. It's just my personal opinion on the two...
View attachment 778420
As far as how to choose between the two, it's totally up to you. You can analyze everything from their skills, to their career, and make an educated decision... or you can simply pick one of them because they made one specific badass movie that simply can't be touched.
Here's a list of their more notable movies:
Bruce Willis:
Die Hard Saga
The Last Boy Scout
Death Becomes Her
Pulp Fiction
12 Monkeys
Last Man Standing
The Fifth Element
The Jackal
Mercury Rising
Armageddon
The Siege
The Sixth Sense
The Whole Nine Yards
Unbreakable
Tears of the Sun
Sin City
Lucky Number Slevin
Surrogates
Looper
RED
Denzel Washington:
Malcom X
Philadelphia
Crimson Tide
Virtuosity
Courage Under Fire
Fallen
The Siege
The Bone Collector
The Hurricane
Remember the Titans
Training Day
John Q
Man on Fire
Deja Vu
American Gangster
Taking of Pelham 123
The Book of Eli
Unstoppable
Flight
The Equalizer
The Magnificent Seven
Fences
Choose wisely, have fun!
Tbh, Denzel hasn't been that great the past 10 years either. Equalizer was aiite and I liked flight, that's bout it. Denzel's peak was training day which was around 20 years ago as well
Fences and Flight are both really good.
It's kind of a toss up for me Bro. They've both had lots of good Movies and lots of bad ones too. I'd say Willis has more good movies, but Denzel is probably the better actor.
Lol I've seen the set up I thinkBruce Willis has more good movies? you have to be joking. Do you realize how much direct-to-video crap Bruce has been in?
I feel like many of you are using the 1980s and 1990s as your only frame of reference. You just stopped paying attention in the 2000s and are out of touch with how their careers have went for the past 20 years.
This is the type of utterly forgettable bargain-bin shit Bruce has been pumping out:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bruce Willis has more good movies? you have to be joking. Do you realize how much direct-to-video crap Bruce has been in?
I feel like many of you are using the 1980s and 1990s as your only frame of reference. You just stopped paying attention in the 2000s and are out of touch with how their careers have went for the past 20 years.
This is the type of utterly forgettable bargain-bin shit Bruce has been pumping out:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hey Bruce, age has nothing to do with acting, you just collect paychecks and leave. It shows. Your last best movie was Unbreakable 20 years ago.....
Denzel is a top 5 actor all time imo Bruce ain't even top 50
Also how don't you even list Glory for Denzel movies when he won an award for his performance?
It's not about quantity bro, Denzel has nothing like Pulp Fiction on his resume.
Have you even seen Glory, bro?
Fences?
Malcom X?
Flight?
Training Day?
Bruce had a supporting role in Pulp Fiction as Denzel did in Glory. Denzel smoked Willis if you want to compare commitment to performances in supporting roles and just acting in general.
Well of course he's a far better actor.
That doesn't change the fact he has nothing as good as Pulp Fiction on his resume.
Who likes Pulp Fiction because of Bruce Willis? It wasn't his movie and he didn't standout in it.Well of course he's a far better actor.
That doesn't change the fact he has nothing as good as Pulp Fiction on his resume.