- Joined
- Nov 7, 2006
- Messages
- 8,347
- Reaction score
- 1
Yeah but he hasn't done real wrestling in like 6+ years and gained the skill back and adapted it to mma quick
That ass though
err sry, distracted by your av
Yeah but he hasn't done real wrestling in like 6+ years and gained the skill back and adapted it to mma quick
Look, you are being a little bitch. You come into a thread to shit on american football because you can tell that obvioisly football is way more physically demanding than soccer. Spare me the pathetic bitching. We all can tell what you are trying to do.I'm not arguing that football is a superior sport because of a greater talent pool, or that Handegg isn't a legitimate sport. I like them both, I would probably follow the NFL if it were more accessible for me. However guys like Brock and more importantly Stephen Neal, do make the sport slightly less legit as a purely sporting event over a purely athletic one. Again, not saying that Handegg is purely athletic, but sport is not just about raw athleticism.
Also, I call it Handegg because that's what it is, deal with it.
And still...
Look, you are being a little bitch. You come into a thread to shit on american football because you can tell that obvioisly football is way more physically demanding than soccer. Spare me the pathetic bitching. We all can tell what you are trying to do.
His NFL combine statistics are better than J.J Watt's. He's clearly a superior athlete than most "A Level" NFL guys.
Terrible ball player though.
Then there's The Nigerian Nightmare.
Exactly. It's not a matter of basketball being a harder sport to succeed at than football.Well tightend anyways, any other positions? I think the skill set u need for tightend is similar to basketball
This is why actual football (soccer to you 'Muricans) is superior as a sport to Handegg. There is not and has never been a man on this planet who could take 10 years away from Football and actually make a top flight teams practice squad. Let alone a guy like Stephen Neal, who didn't play for at least 4 years, then went on to win the highest prize in the sport.
I stumbled upon this video of Brock Lesnar playing for the Minnesota Vikings back in 2004:
I think the thing that surprised me most is just how ordinary, or even sub-par, he looked. Yes, I understand this was his first attempt at football in nearly a decade (and he had only ever played high school ball), and to make even the practice squad of a professional football team with nothing but pure physical ability is absolutely remarkable. Still, when surrounded by similarly massive linemen, Lesnar loses that "specimen" mystique that he has in both the UFC and the WWE.
We talk a lot about how the best athletes in the world aren't in MMA; they're earning real money in more prolific sports. Does Lesnar's short stint in the NFL prove that? Or does it prove just the opposite - that on pure natural talent and next to no actual training and experience, Lesnar could hang with the pros regardless of all of their supposed advantages, and they're not all the incredible athletes we make them out to be? (For context, if we assume each of the 32 NFL teams has 6-7 defensive lineman, that makes Lesnar in the top 200 in the WORLD - and that's with no prior experience whatsoever.)
EDIT: Sorry the link doesn't embed properly. At least you can still watch it on YouTube.
There's not a single handegg player that could make a football team, so its a bit of a moot point reallylol, there's not a single soccer player that could make a handegg team
Didn't JDS smoke him in the football based coaches challenge.
I think we understate how athletic some of the UFC HW division os
Stephen Neal, the guy that beat Brock twice in the NCAA championships, played in the NFL without any prior experience and won a couple Superbowl rings.