International Brexit Discussion v8: Theresa May's Final Hours

Arkain2K

Si vis pacem, para bellum
@Steel
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
33,424
Reaction score
5,685


Brexit Discussion, Part 8: Theresa May's Final Hours


Brexit Discussion, Part 7: The Self-Sabotage
Brexit Discussion, Part 6: The Divorce Begins

Brexit Discussion, Part 5: The In-Fighting

Brexit Discussion, Part 4: The Back-Pedaling

Brexit Discussion, Part 3: The World's Reaction to Brexit

Brexit Discussion, Part 2: The Day After The Vote

Brexit Discussion, Part 1: Counting Down to the Referendum
 
Last edited:
 
Last edited:


 
Last edited:


That was their faulty bluff all along, thinking it's the UE that would be terrified by a no deal and would have the most to lose. This has to be one of the worst negotiation strategy in the history of international treaties.
 
That was their faulty bluff all along, thinking it's the UE that would be terrified by a no deal and would have the most to lose. This has to be one of the worst negotiation strategy in the history of international treaties.

It is the direct result of delusions of grandeur, which again are the result of the UK not completely being satisfied with the fact that the days of the Empire are long, long gone.

The UK is important for the EU, and the EU will be weaker without it.

That said, there was never going to be parity, nor was e.g. Germany gonna give its position within Europe up just to sell a couple cars to the UK. This was a gross misconception, but tbh, nobody can seriously have believed that. Everyone I know has always been shaking their heads in disbelief over this approach.
 
Really gonna be interesting how this is gonna play out. There still is lots of disturbance potential regarding the extension (e.g. Italy following Farage's request and not agreeing to extend, blackmail potential on Spain's behalf, etc.). Also, hard brexit proponents are faced with the possibility of revocation as ultima ratio, something May has not threatened with but if I were her, I would put the instrument on the table.
 
Really gonna be interesting how this is gonna play out. There still is lots of disturbance potential regarding the extension (e.g. Italy following Farage's request and not agreeing to extend, blackmail potential on Spain's behalf, etc.). Also, hard brexit proponents are faced with the possibility of revocation as ultima ratio, something May has not threatened with but if I were her, I would put the instrument on the table.

A lot depends on Bercow in his role as speaker of the house he should be stopping the government trying to grind Parliament down by continually repreposing deals the house has already rejected multiple times , there are precedents to deal with those sorts of shenanigans he needs to stick to them .
 
It's worth remembering that the current mess is the easy bit - triggering brexit. Once the UK is out the real challenge of implementing it begins, running for the next 5-10 years.
 
It's worth remembering that the current mess is the easy bit - triggering brexit. Once the UK is out the real challenge of implementing it begins, running for the next 5-10 years.

Actually negotiations with the EU will be the difficult part. This is only setting the stage.
 
Do you guys remember v1 of this thread, when the talk of town was the U.K vs. E.U, not the U.K repeatedly beating itself up Fight Club style while the shocked and confused E.U watches with their mouth dropped wide open?

With compatriots like Corbyn and Labour sabotaging the negotiation process, who the fuck needs enemies.
 
Last edited:
Do you guys remember v1 of this thread, when the talk of town was the U.K vs. E.U, not the U.K repeatedly beating itself up Fight Club style while the shocked and confused E.U watches with their mouth dropped wide open?

With compatriots like Corbyn and Labour sabotaging the negotiation process, who the fuck needs enemies.

The enemies are the uninformed (and unwilling to be informed) public.

They need politically quarantining for the next 3 years while this all gets resolved.
 
Do you guys remember v1 of this thread, when the talk of town was the U.K vs. E.U, not the U.K repeatedly beating itself up Fight Club style while the shocked and confused E.U watches with their mouth dropped wide open?

With compatriots like Corbyn and Labour sabotaging the negotiation process, who the fuck needs enemies.

I would add the ERG.
 
Do you guys remember v1 of this thread, when the talk of town was the U.K vs. E.U, not the U.K repeatedly beating itself up Fight Club style while the shocked and confused E.U watches with their mouth dropped wide open?

With compatriots like Corbyn and Labour sabotaging the negotiation process, who the fuck needs enemies.

The basic issue with brexit is that a strong government is needed to deliver it, but a strong government would never allow it.

Hence it happening is by default going to be a big mess.
 
Do you guys remember v1 of this thread, when the talk of town was the U.K vs. E.U, not the U.K repeatedly beating itself up Fight Club style while the shocked and confused E.U watches with their mouth dropped wide open?

With compatriots like Corbyn and Labour sabotaging the negotiation process, who the fuck needs enemies.
yeah that was when all the pro brexit goons were talking in slogans thinking Brexit would lead to the UK becoming the land of milk and honey, everyone would get their own unicorn and a blowjob from the movie star of their choice.

Then reality set in and they fucked off and left the most inept Tory party in history to "negotiate" a deal. This shitshow is due to the brexiteers(corbyn included). But mostly due to the Tories and their red lines that limited any kind of deal we couldve had.
 
With compatriots like Corbyn and Labour sabotaging the negotiation process, who the fuck needs enemies.

Labour doesn't have the majority. Corbyn's strategy is a disaster, but he still can't single-handedly derail May's negotiations, it's a far bigger mess than that.
 
Labour doesn't have the majority. Corbyn's strategy is a disaster, but he still can't single-handedly derail May's negotiations, it's a far bigger mess than that.

The biggest mess would be a no deal brexit followed by an immediate general election with Labour winning..... the horror.
 
That was their faulty bluff all along, thinking it's the UE that would be terrified by a no deal and would have the most to lose. This has to be one of the worst negotiation strategy in the history of international treaties.

I kind of suspect that it was the civil services/May's plan all along to let it play out ineptly. Everyone sensible knows that being in euroupe is better for the people after all.

It is the direct result of delusions of grandeur, which again are the result of the UK not completely being satisfied with the fact that the days of the Empire are long, long gone.

The UK is important for the EU, and the EU will be weaker without it.

That said, there was never going to be parity, nor was e.g. Germany gonna give its position within Europe up just to sell a couple cars to the UK. This was a gross misconception, but tbh, nobody can seriously have believed that. Everyone I know has always been shaking their heads in disbelief over this approach.

Not so sure re the delusions of grandeur, as other countries have had similar grumblings. A nationalist bill of goods is usually easily sold.

The UK has a much better deal than anyone else in the EU already, it wasn't based on inequity, it wasn't a movement based on any rational basis but an emotional one.

Do you guys remember v1 of this thread, when the talk of town was the U.K vs. E.U, not the U.K repeatedly beating itself up Fight Club style while the shocked and confused E.U watches with their mouth dropped wide open?

With compatriots like Corbyn and Labour sabotaging the negotiation process, who the fuck needs enemies.

Corbyn has believed that Europe is a capitalist entity that prevents Britain from going full socialist. That's been his, and the harder lefts position forever. They saw this whole process as a chance for both the Tory's to give up power for a generation by splitting their party and for Britain to increase its sovereignty whilst limiting the control of international finance and businesses on our political system.

He has been pretty continuous in his efforts and isn't in the pocket of some big business interests and that is about the most you can ask of a politician whether you agree with them or not.

For the record, I do not, but I respect their position and efforts.

The basic issue with brexit is that a strong government is needed to deliver it, but a strong government would never allow it.

Hence it happening is by default going to be a big mess.

Solid summation.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top