- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- 0
weird. all 3 judges gave it to sonnen, and i recall at least one of them was 30-27. sonnen had more strikes and td's in every round. he got dominant positions, sub-attempts, etc. anyone thinking bisping should have won needs to watch the fight again. i was shocked at how many people thought bisping should have won; probably just residual sonnen hatred not letting them watch the fight accurately.
the judges opinions hardly make the decision valid. I can't argue specifics (nor do i want to) because I'm relying on memory and I could make a mistake. As I remember it tho, bispingg outstruck sonnen on the feet in rounds 1 and 2, defended the takedown well, and got right back up whenever successfully taken down.
My main point tho was that, it couldn't have been "easily" won by either fighter as evidenced by the difference of opinion on who won.