- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 8,963
- Reaction score
- 6,144
Instead of refuting the sworn testimonies of victims which are not part of "tucker" or MSM, but public record of unsealed documents with no political or news affiliations, you somehow try to create a false equivalency between what MsM is reporting and the facts of the case as if it is some kind of propaganda.
That is called "dishonest debate" sir and shows you have little to contribute intellectually other than attempts at gaslighting to get away from facts.
Sworn testimonies.........yet when the glare of a judicial court (and a threat of perjury) is on them they scurry away to hide back under the rock they crawled from.
Why they be like dat, bro?