Right, parts of the scientific community are 'frauds' but you, a clairvoyant into the teachings of mother nature, is spared the burden of having to read, learn, do experiments to actually figure out how nature works.
Since you have such blatant distrust in science, I presume you do not go to doctors that have, in fact, been educated through the traditional channels of academic training and Western scientific discourse, as it has developed since the modern period. I presume your understanding of nature, which speaks loudly and clearly to you, gave you innate knowledge of the genome, of evolutionary biology, of the deep structure of the quantum physical universe, the laws of motion, statistical mechanics, the composition of elements, and the entirety of medical knowledge that has essentially allowed mortality rates to drop throughout human history.
You have an immediate connection to nature, which somehow overrides all pretenses at expert knowledge, because of course learning, studying, and doing experiments is just partaking in some kind of cult, while appealing to some kind of luminosity into nature is non-dogmatic. You're not only an idiot, but a lazy hypocrite, who tries to camouflage their ignorance as knowledge. To say "nature speaks" is simply sophistry, the use of a loose metaphorical vocabulary to pretend as if knowledge was immediately abstracted from nature. Which is not only wrong, but stupid.
And thank you for mentioning Katter's case, who was turned down from the Institute and then tried to perform mastectomy on herself before being admitted to the hospital and treated in a life-saving emergency operation.
"Aged 16, Katter had visited the IfS to see Dr Ludwig Levy-Lenz (1862–1966) and request breast-removal surgery. The request was denied due to Katter’s young age. Katter returned a few days later – this time, as a patient requiring urgent medical care, having attempted to remove his own breasts with a cutthroat razor. Both breasts had to be removed in an emergency operation."