It's about a lawyer that gets involved with drug trafficking and as expected things go bad. It's written by Carmac McCarthy (No Country for Old Men) and directed by Ridley Scott. Michael Fassbender plays the Counselor and Penelope Cruz is his fiance. Brad Pitt, Cameron Diaz, and Javier Bardem (No Country for Old Men, Skyfall) are also in it.
The plot is very obvious and uninteresting. It has a lot of dialog that I think was supposed to be deep and compelling but often came off as contrived and pointless (though it has some interesting points). The cinematography and visuals were good and the acting was solid so I'm inclined to say that the script was the biggest issue. It felt like I was supposed to think it was a really compelling, gritty movie but it wasn't.
Very few hollywoodesque movies have me feeling compelled, and or gritted.
I could see how that could be something that sounds like it should be good, but doesn't quite come together. My initial thought is how is it that a lawyer would just happen to get involved in drug trafficking? How would you make that work without it either being a Breaking Bad thing, having the lawyer make surprisingly stupid decisions, or relying on some unrealistic twist?
Traffic is an example of a similar but far superior movie however it came out in 2000 so it's not exactly recent. I can't think of the last recent movie I watched that I'd consider compelling.
Life of Pi was compelling actually but mostly because of the amazing visuals. The plot was meh.
I think traffic had its moments but it was mostly how it was film rather than the movie itself. I felt it was effective that way. Much like Saving Private Ryan was.
Life of Pi was spectaular in terms of visuals, the stroy is nice, but not a great movie.
I'd rate Traffic 7/10 or 8/10, either way worth a watch while I'd rate The Counselor 4/10 and say it's not worth wasting your time and money.
[YT]zSVkqwDD1TM[YT]
FS also posted this in the main.