Barr and Mueller's Two Testie-fy (SCO v. 34)

Status
Not open for further replies.
serveimage
so two...one is an acquaintance. Tell me about how you invited one over that one time.
 
so two...one is an acquaintance. Tell me about how you invited one over that one time.

I have no fucking idea what the hell you are talking about.

I was making a joke and then you come in with a random question that had nothing to do with anything.

BTW, isn't this a bit racist to you?

rep-steve-cohen-mocks-a-g-barr-with-bucket-of-chicken-joke-backfires.jpg


He's sitting in Sheila Jackson Lee's (A Black Woman) chair holding a Chicken Drumstick. <Moves>

(I do hope that's not Sheila on the left taking a picture....if it is, she just insulted her own race)
 
Do you dispute what I just said regarding Impeachment?

(and why are you quoting Pelosi? Think for yourself)
You attribute "nobody is above the law" to Pelosi? Trust me it's the obvious response to what you wrote. Congress has the responsibility of oversight. Nadler can subpoena Barr. If he doesn't show he can hold him in contempt. To be honest I don't recall the outcome of any similar prior cases but it will likely end before a judge and not just the DoJ waving Nadler away with a laugh.
 
You attribute "nobody is above the law" to Pelosi? Trust me it's the obvious response to what you wrote. Congress has the responsibility of oversight. Nadler can subpoena Barr. If he doesn't show he can hold him in contempt. To be honest I don't recall the outcome of any similar prior cases but it will likely end before a judge and not just the DoJ waving Nadler away with a laugh.

Give me a break.

Barr is not getting prosecuted. He's the AG and the DOJ is the department that does the Prosecuting. <JagsKiddingMe>

You still haven't answered my question regarding impeachment.

Is it perhaps because you know that he can't be removed due to a Republican Senate and thus all the Impeachment articles are good for is to crap on Barr's reputation? o_O
 
I have no fucking idea what the hell you are talking about.

I was making a joke and then you come in with a random question that had nothing to do with anything.

BTW, isn't this a bit racist to you?

rep-steve-cohen-mocks-a-g-barr-with-bucket-of-chicken-joke-backfires.jpg


He's sitting in Sheila Jackson Lee's (A Black Woman) chair holding a Chicken Drumstick. <Moves>

(I do hope that's not Sheila on the left taking a picture....if it is, she just insulted her own race)
It's a little something called perspective. I don't think he was actually in her chair.
 
meh, he lied and clearly so.

Regardless, it comes down to Mueller coming before congress...everything else is just bs.


Meuller testifying is supposed to do what, contradict the findings of his own report?

There was no conspiracy with Russia, and there was not obstruction beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s what he found. That’s what he’ll testify to.


Are you really expecting to get anything more than a talking point that lasts a week?
 
Not bad....for a fucking Poll that doesn't mean jack until the actual elections :

2zzsc0.jpg

<Fedor23>
 
Give me a break.

Barr is not getting prosecuted. He's the AG and the DOJ is the department that does the Prosecuting. <JagsKiddingMe>

You still haven't answered my question regarding impeachment.

Is it perhaps because you know that he can't be removed due to a Republican Senate and thus all the Impeachment articles are good for is to crap on Barr's reputation? o_O
Who has been quoted as saying they will impeach Barr? I'f he hasn't even been subpoenaed yet that would be jumping the gun.
 
Meuller testifying is supposed to do what, contradict the findings of his own report?

There was no conspiracy with Russia, and there was not obstruction beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s what he found. That’s what he’ll testify to.


Are you really expecting to get anything more than a talking point that lasts a week?

No. What he wants is the Political bullshit that Mueller tried to have Barr shovel to the Democrats and Left-wing Media for use in their Presidential aspirations (2020), which Barr put a stop to.
 
He knew what the question was, and he answered it. You just didn't like the answer. Barr can't speak to what other member's of the Mueller team thought because he didn't talk to them. It's a pretty simple scenario unless you've got that whole confirmation bias thing going on, which you clearly do.
no you are being stupid.

If someone says today

- Did anyone on Mueller's team find elements of collusion
- did anyone on Mueller's team find elements of obstruction

And you KNOW Mueller himself because he wrote you a letter saying he did, but you say 'oh that came from Mueller, you asked about his team, that is why I said no,' you are lying.

And you are making yourself a joke by trying to spin that.

Mueller is part of the Mueller team. He is an investigator within the team. He is not some outsider to the team like Barr. You cannot separate Mueller from the team.
 
Last edited:
Boy....you know it’s rough when Ted Cruz of all people flexes on your theory and shits on it to the point of making Barr audibly laugh at the foolishness

Who ever the hack from Hawaii named Mazie is...she’s the mirror image of the goof troop in this thread. So taken aback by their hate for Trump that they can’t even perform their jobs correctly. Pretty amazing that a person like Barr has to sit there and explain the law to sitting senators. Was that your best Hawaii?

Anyone who doesn’t just look at these threads with utter ridicule is already too far gone
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top