- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 8,879
- Reaction score
- 2
Look at this fool teasing the black woman with fried chicken:
She be like “NO! Is you serious?”
She be like “NO! Is you serious?”
Barr and Mueller's Two Testie-fy (SCO v. 34)
- Thread starter Quipling
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2016
- Messages
- 34,541
- Reaction score
- 23,540
Mueller was assigned specifically because of his character and bipartisan support. I know Trump's attempts to assassinate it over the last 2 years is all some of you guys need but his summaries should have been released. The "other side" has no faith in Barr being an honest broker. He might be the AG but he's acting like Trump's lawyer giving him the personal protection he has claimed is his right to receive.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2016
- Messages
- 34,541
- Reaction score
- 23,540
Nobody is above the law.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2002
- Messages
- 19,737
- Reaction score
- 4,941
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,458
- Reaction score
- 768
Democrats put their own twist on Barr’s no-show, with Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn bringing a bucket of KFC to the hearing and placing it beside Barr’s empty seat.
Just found this out right now. Really pisses me off.
This combined with Gaetz being cut off.....I'm telling you that Nadler really needs an ass-kicking and not of the verbal variety.
Maybe he can get one once Barr has him arrested and placed in a cell with Hillary...
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2016
- Messages
- 34,541
- Reaction score
- 23,540
I have only heard Barr make that claim and then refuse to supply the transcript that would prove it.So I just want to be clear I understood correctly :
You DO agree that Mueller told Barr that his summary was NOT inaccurate or misrepresenting?
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,458
- Reaction score
- 768
Do you dispute what I just said regarding Impeachment?
(and why are you quoting Pelosi? Think for yourself)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
- Messages
- 3,742
- Reaction score
- 389
He's haunting Blinkist.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,458
- Reaction score
- 768
And now for @hillelslovak87 's "favorite person in the whole wide world" :
Joseph diGenova: Dems embarrass themselves at Barr hearing and show disregard for truth
The interrogation of Attorney General William Barr was an embarrassing spectacle that only revealed one fact — the Democrats don’t care about the truth.
Throughout a hearing Wednesday, Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee grilled Barr about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, attempting to portray the two-time attorney general as a liar who failed to accurately summarize the key details of the Russia collusion investigation. The basis for those insinuations was a letter that Mueller wrote to Barr on March 27, which was suspiciously leaked the night before the hearing.
Forlorn and frustrated after the collapse of their Russia collusion hoax, Democrats seized on the letter as an opportunity to reframe the public narrative in their favor, even though it didn’t actually contradict the attorney general in any way.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., for instance, questioned whether Barr's previous congressional testimony was “misleading” in light of the revelation that Mueller was unhappy with the media coverage of Barr’s initial letter to Congress.
Other lawmakers also referenced Mueller’s letter, suggesting that Barr should have told Congress about the special counsel’s letter when lawmakers asked him at a previous hearing whether he was aware of any concerns within the Special Counsel’s Office about his characterization of the report’s findings.
Notably, however, Barr was only asked whether some members of Mueller’s team took issue with the accuracy of his summary — not whether Mueller wanted to see more context in Barr’s initial letter.
“I spoke to Bob Mueller, not members of his team,” Barr explained. “And I did not know what was being referred to, and Mueller had never told me that the expression of the findings was inaccurate.”
In fact, according to The Washington Post, Mueller explicitly denied that he thought Barr’s summary was inaccurate during a phone call with the attorney general just days after Mueller sent his letter, saying his concern was actually about media coverage that was “misinterpreting” Barr’s language.
Unsatisfied by Barr’s truthful responses, some Democrats gave up on asking questions and started grandstanding, haranguing Barr about their own interpretations of Mueller’s letter.
Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, gave the most disgusting performance, spending nearly all of her allotted time hurling baseless accusations at Barr and demanding that he resign before squeezing in a few accusatory questions. By the time she was finished, Sen. Lindsey Graham, the committee’s chairman, felt compelled to reprimand her for using her time to “slander” the attorney general rather than asking him substantive questions.
Other Democrats took a different approach, arguing that Barr is “biased” because he did not come to the same conclusion they did about whether President Trump obstructed justice — a determination Mueller explicitly punted to Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
Sen. Kamala Harris, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, actually suggested that Barr should recuse himself from overseeing the ongoing investigations that grew out of the Mueller probe on the grounds that his interpretation of Mueller’s findings differed from her own.
Barr’s testimony, however, merely confirmed what we already knew: President Trump did not collude with Russia, and there is not sufficient evidence to justify charges of obstructing justice.
Sadly, no witch-hunt is complete without an inquisition, and the only thing the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing lacked in that regard was a torture rack for extracting false confessions. Barr held his ground without skipping a beat because, despite the protests of the Democrats, he’s got truth on his side.
>>> Couldn't agree more with @hillelslovak87 's FAVORITE person ever.
Joseph diGenova: Dems embarrass themselves at Barr hearing and show disregard for truth
The interrogation of Attorney General William Barr was an embarrassing spectacle that only revealed one fact — the Democrats don’t care about the truth.
Throughout a hearing Wednesday, Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee grilled Barr about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, attempting to portray the two-time attorney general as a liar who failed to accurately summarize the key details of the Russia collusion investigation. The basis for those insinuations was a letter that Mueller wrote to Barr on March 27, which was suspiciously leaked the night before the hearing.
Forlorn and frustrated after the collapse of their Russia collusion hoax, Democrats seized on the letter as an opportunity to reframe the public narrative in their favor, even though it didn’t actually contradict the attorney general in any way.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., for instance, questioned whether Barr's previous congressional testimony was “misleading” in light of the revelation that Mueller was unhappy with the media coverage of Barr’s initial letter to Congress.
Other lawmakers also referenced Mueller’s letter, suggesting that Barr should have told Congress about the special counsel’s letter when lawmakers asked him at a previous hearing whether he was aware of any concerns within the Special Counsel’s Office about his characterization of the report’s findings.
Notably, however, Barr was only asked whether some members of Mueller’s team took issue with the accuracy of his summary — not whether Mueller wanted to see more context in Barr’s initial letter.
“I spoke to Bob Mueller, not members of his team,” Barr explained. “And I did not know what was being referred to, and Mueller had never told me that the expression of the findings was inaccurate.”
In fact, according to The Washington Post, Mueller explicitly denied that he thought Barr’s summary was inaccurate during a phone call with the attorney general just days after Mueller sent his letter, saying his concern was actually about media coverage that was “misinterpreting” Barr’s language.
Unsatisfied by Barr’s truthful responses, some Democrats gave up on asking questions and started grandstanding, haranguing Barr about their own interpretations of Mueller’s letter.
Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, gave the most disgusting performance, spending nearly all of her allotted time hurling baseless accusations at Barr and demanding that he resign before squeezing in a few accusatory questions. By the time she was finished, Sen. Lindsey Graham, the committee’s chairman, felt compelled to reprimand her for using her time to “slander” the attorney general rather than asking him substantive questions.
Other Democrats took a different approach, arguing that Barr is “biased” because he did not come to the same conclusion they did about whether President Trump obstructed justice — a determination Mueller explicitly punted to Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
Sen. Kamala Harris, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, actually suggested that Barr should recuse himself from overseeing the ongoing investigations that grew out of the Mueller probe on the grounds that his interpretation of Mueller’s findings differed from her own.
Barr’s testimony, however, merely confirmed what we already knew: President Trump did not collude with Russia, and there is not sufficient evidence to justify charges of obstructing justice.
Sadly, no witch-hunt is complete without an inquisition, and the only thing the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing lacked in that regard was a torture rack for extracting false confessions. Barr held his ground without skipping a beat because, despite the protests of the Democrats, he’s got truth on his side.
>>> Couldn't agree more with @hillelslovak87 's FAVORITE person ever.
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 8,879
- Reaction score
- 2
Mueller was chosen because he wanted to take out Trump. He failed. Time to pay the piper. Barr owns you now. Fuck “the other side.”
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 25,851
- Reaction score
- 14,304
how many black friends do you have? Tell us about themRACIST!!!!
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2017
- Messages
- 5,604
- Reaction score
- 1,866
Well, this is becoming fairly entertaining.
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 24,615
- Reaction score
- 1,315
Soo.... you haven't actually read the report, huh?
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 25,851
- Reaction score
- 14,304
lol...definitely the democrats fault Barr was too scared to face more than a 5 minute questioning sessions. Oh Bob. The big bad attorney general doesn't want to take questions he can't filibuster for 5 minutes and get a 5 minute break from the republicans.
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 24,615
- Reaction score
- 1,315
America's anti-hacking laws are so loose, even Donald Trump Jr broke them. So, what do we do about it?
I leave it to the reader to form an opinion on the seriousness of the crime, but it leaves no doubt Jr. is a moron. And it leaves no doubt Barr's redactions are intended to serve the President, not justice. Fuck 'em both.
So you.... didn't actually read the report, and neither obviously did the people whose opinons you're parroting. JUST READ THE REPORT. It will clear up so much of the confusion for you folks on the Left.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,458
- Reaction score
- 768
^^^ didn’t watch the video, and FYI, nobody is buying the faux outrage the left is having. Especially not Barr.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,458
- Reaction score
- 768
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 25,851
- Reaction score
- 14,304
meh, he lied and clearly so.
Regardless, it comes down to Mueller coming before congress...everything else is just bs.
- Status
