Social Aunt Jemima has been cancelled

Rockapotomuss

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
3,504
Reaction score
1,346
It’s about time! After over 120 years of racism associating black people with syrup and pancake mix, Aunt Jemima is finally coming to an end. BLM!
 
TITANIC-SINKS.jpg
 
Hard to imagine why anyone thought this was inappropriate:

1412629242001-early-aunt-jemima.jpg


Yeah, darn that poor black woman for not looking like a fit, white supermodel!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Green
She only dedicated her life after being freed from a slave to missionary work, activism, and improving the lives of people in Chicago living in poverty. But damnit, she was ugly so she needs to be cancelled!
 
Ya they already made her look more white. Why is the original more racist?

In sociology class we learned about the over representation of white models in advertising. Here we have a 19th century black woman advertisement. How is that not super progressive?
 
I was out raged about it yesterday. I’m still outraged today.


:meow:
 
It's racist when black people look black.
Ya they already made her look more white. Why is the original more racist?

In sociology class we learned about the over representation of white models in advertising. Here we have a 19th century black woman advertisement. How is that not super progressive?
 
good syrup IMO. A lot of poor white people use it. I enjoy it as maple syrup is over $20 a bottle. This stuffs like $4.
 
Yeah, darn that poor black woman for not looking like a fit, white supermodel!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Green
She only dedicated her life after being freed from a slave to missionary work, activism, and improving the lives of people in Chicago living in poverty. But damnit, she was ugly so she needs to be cancelled!

Yes, that's the problem with those depictions. It's that she's not fit.
 
Humbly nominate this kid for their new mascot

Cabin-Fever-Pancakes-Kid.jpg
You seriously believe an image depicting a blonde haired, blue eyed, fair-skinned individual is appropriate?

At the very least the syrup bottle would require some sort of trigger warning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zer
Ya they already made her look more white. Why is the original more racist?

In sociology class we learned about the over representation of white models in advertising. Here we have a 19th century black woman advertisement. How is that not super progressive?

You know there were nice clothes in the 19th century. Moreover, you do understand that Quaker Oats had the money to buy one or two nice dresses for their wardrobe. See the white lady below:
Screen-Shot-2020-06-17-at-10.28.43-AM.jpg


She's always depicted poorly dressed, typically in servitude and enjoying her servitude. Always waiting on white people.

Chef Boyardee got a chef's uniform and a hat with his name on it.
 
You know there were nice clothes in the 19th century. Moreover, you do understand that Quaker Oats had the money to buy one or two nice dresses for their wardrobe. See the white lady below:
Screen-Shot-2020-06-17-at-10.28.43-AM.jpg


She's always depicted poorly dressed, typically in servitude and enjoying her servitude. Always waiting on white people.

Chef Boyardee got a chef's uniform and a hat with his name on it.

The real woman was a former slave. Why would they dress her up as an aristocrat? She was an antipoverty activist, not the Monopoly man.
 
Last edited:
Do you understand how racist it is to criticize a portrait of a real freed slave for having too many African features?
I dont think his brain will process that that is what she actually looks like.
 
It’s an indisputably racist holdover from a foregone era but I’m not sure what the end goal is here and how you even define that “end.”

As far as creating racial harmony is concerned, I would hardly call these moves a giant leap for mankind — even cumulatively.

This isn’t changing hearts and minds and I would venture to guess it is making racists even more racist than they already were.
 
Well it's about time.

Racism is about to plummet now.
 
Back
Top