- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 126,937
- Reaction score
- 62,493
not too far from tejas, ya know....
It's miles away, ya loon :icon_lol:
Made me look though.
not too far from tejas, ya know....
This would only make sense if people chose to get cancer after trying it out for a few years to see if it was right for them. Then deciding that cancer made them so happy they wanted to spend the rest of their life with it. So they invited all of their friends and loved ones to a big, expensive ceremony where they proclaimed their eternal love for cancer and made solemn vows that, "for better or for worse," they would stand by cancer's side in holy matrimony. Then they consummated their love by having little melanoma babies.
So marriage is a little bit different from cancer, I'd say.
Except, some people could be in a place where they regret their divorce for some reason. be it the kids, the financial impact, the relationship, the lack of effort, etc...
I thoroughly enjoyed both the analogy and the rebuttal
Are you actually confusing a wedding with a marriage? Proclaiming love for someone and inviting friends and family to a ceremony aren't the same as a marriage, for one thing.
And not every marriage is a cancer. I'm happily married. But I'm also divorced. And I'll use the cancer analogy again, just for you:
Find something that a person might enjoy that can, but doesn't always, result in cancer. Say smoking, drinking, exposure to the sun, eating meat, using artificial sweeteners, etc. When (if) that cancer develops, what was once something you enjoyed -- loved even -- has resulted in a nasty, burdensome, debilitating, hell even life-threatening condition.
...and you're at least partially to blame, because you chose the agent responsible for your condition. Yes indeed.
But there's a way out. Involving harm to you, for sure -- for cancer it is surgery and/or chemotherapy and/or radiation treatments, which leave you weakened and scarred, but hopefully, in the end, cancer-free. Some are able to escape this condition before it drags them into the grave.
The equivalent to cancer removal in a marriage gone bad is divorce. Unpleasant, expensive, and with consequences of its own, but it rids you of that burden, that disease that's afflicted you. The disease you never had the intention of contracting, but that got you anyway.
So yeah, my analogy fits. I "regret" getting divorced just like I'd "regret" having a tumor removed.
That's a fair explanation, but small correction.
In your analogy, cutting off the tumor would be fixing the marriage, not divorce. Divorce would be stopping whatever habit developed the cancer (sun exposure, sweeteners, etc). I'd also add that it's an imperfect analogy because people can change whereas things like smoking, sun exposure, etc can not.
The problem I have with people saying that divorce is what happens when two people realize they are truly wrong together is that divorce rates have skyrocketed in the last few decades. So either people somehow now suck at choosing partners (which is possible, but I don't see how or why), or it has less to do with the partner you choose and more to do with the attitudes towards marriage.