- Joined
- Feb 22, 2014
- Messages
- 2,139
- Reaction score
- 2,581
Trying to actually explain that goes poorly. "An elbow to the temple plus a hard roundhouse to the body, after adjusting slightly up for slightly greater total striking volume, clearly had less impact than a hard jab to the face and a knee to the body" isn't really a winning argument. Sure, it was a really nice jab and the camera angle on the elbow makes it difficult to judge the elbow's impact, but still. It's one thing to say Ank won round three -- wrong, IMO, but entirely justifiable -- but claiming that he clearly won round three and that anyone who says otherwise doesn't understand what they're talking about is pure ignorance.Aspinall doesn't understand how round scoring works, yet he is calling us uneducated. He could at least explain why he thinks there's no way Pereira won round 3, which is the only relevant round.