Armatix Smart Gun

Groundmaster said:
No one needs firearms.
Click to expand...

nobody needs cars either but it sure is alot easier to go to the grocery store and go to work than walking..... kinda like its alot easier to secure yourself than a cell phone

1361372181_1426_illinois5773.jpg
 
Groundmaster said:
True - but I never said anyone did need cars. However the poster I quoted was speaking about ppl needing guns.
Click to expand...

okay then, here's a question

lets say I'm an independent 25 year old woman, live in Detroit, want to go on an afternoon stroll, unfortunately my neighborhood has been riddled with violent crime, rape, theft, etc. etc. as of late

do i stay inside? losing freedom and stay locked up in my own walls?

do i lose my independence and have a group of friends come over so they can walk with me?

or do i put a small handgun in my waist band and go enjoy a walk then come back home and "if" the off chance i was ever in a bad situation i would be able to protect myself?

I would say the woman would be best suited to be armed, just in case, not for paranoia because there is a high percentage chance of violent crime especially on smaller/weaker more vulnerable women..... a 200lb felon vs a 100lb woman isn't fair until she has an equalizer in her pocket, a handgun.

.
 
Groundmaster said:
True - but I never said anyone did need cars. However the poster I quoted was speaking about ppl needing guns. Also has the image in your post anything to do with the topic of the thread?
Click to expand...

Robert's posts NEVER have anything to add to a thread, he is a mouth breather, and a brainless one at that. I have no idea why he doesn't get banned.

Maybe I could feed him this url and watch his head pop off.

http://consortiumnews.com/2014/02/06/ronald-reagan-worst-president-ever-2/
 
ruthless robert said:
okay then, here's a question

lets say I'm an independent 25 year old woman, live in Detroit, want to go on an afternoon stroll, unfortunately my neighborhood has been riddled with violent crime, rape, theft, etc. etc. as of late

do i stay inside? losing freedom and stay locked up in my own walls?

do i lose my independence and have a group of friends come over so they can walk with me?

or do i put a small handgun in my waist band and go enjoy a walk then come back home and "if" the off chance i was ever in a bad situation i would be able to protect myself?

I would say the woman would be best suited to be armed, just in case, not for paranoia because there is a high percentage chance of violent crime especially on smaller/weaker more vulnerable women..... a 200lb felon vs a 100lb woman isn't fair until she has an equalizer in her pocket, a handgun.

.
Click to expand...

GO AWAY, this has nothing to do with the Armatix debate.

Are you slow or something? Whats your deal?
 
Throttlehead said:
GO AWAY, this has nothing to do with the Armatix debate.

Are you slow or something? Whats your deal?
Click to expand...

look dude, there are SEVERAL people getting off topic and on other gun issues...... quit riding my nuts and ride everyone else's in the same manner.

get off my dick, I'm not the only one so quit ignoring EVERY post that isn't in response to this particular subject.

here's a little info on your subject, it's a dumb idea and 99% of gun owner will not own something like that but if you want to go ahead with something like that then by all means spend your money on it but i can tell you government will push this and the public will bash this, PERIOD.

.
 
Throttlehead said:
Robert's posts NEVER have anything to add to a thread, he is a mouth breather, and a brainless one at that. I have no idea why he doesn't get banned.
Click to expand...

Out of compassion maybe - or do the mods simply have a very warped sense of humor?
 
ruthless robert said:
look dude, there are SEVERAL people getting off topic and on other gun issues...... quit riding my nuts and ride everyone else's in the same manner.

get off my dick, I'm not the only one so quit ignoring EVERY post that isn't in response to this particular subject.

here's a little info on your subject, it's a dumb idea and 99% of gun owner will not own something like that but if you want to go ahead with something like that then by all means spend your money on it but i can tell you government will push this and the public will bash this, PERIOD.

.
Click to expand...

Yeah yeah the government will do this that, whatever.

If thats your conclusion, why are you in here? LEAVE and post your breitbart crap threads. You side with the 1% in every one of your other breitbart threads, why you siding with the 99% this time?
 
Throttlehead said:
Yeah yeah the government will do this that, whatever.

If thats your conclusion, why are you in here? LEAVE and post your breitbart crap threads. You side with the 1% in every one of your other breitbart threads, why you siding with the 99% this time?
Click to expand...

hmm, seems like you're getting off topic, have a hatred for me and approach me in a manner with that hatred on your mind. seems like you really dont care for my opinion on the matter so why not have a disclaimer on your OP stating that if people have different views then you want them to leave.

you know as well as i do that politicians will jump all over this and push it as a future for safety, when its nothing more than a controlling device. rather you like my opinion of not, i dont like it and neither do 99% of gun owners.....

so since you're preaching about staying on subject, can we continue talking about this electronic device and stop bringing up things that don't have anything to do with it??? i thought that was why you were mad at me to begin with??? but you've already showed you dont like me and already had your mind made up and had a biased approach the moment you clicked reply....

here's your problem with politicians getting in the gun business





Eric Holder is specifically talking about this very thing your thread is about.


.
 
ABACA said:
Robert, tell us about your seal friends!
Click to expand...

which ones? related to 2 and close friends with 3. Im also an FFL dealer and I specialize in high end AR's so im lucky enough to deal with/make friends with all kinds of vets.

but you're getting off track here, i would suggest watching the 2 short vids i posted above

.
 
Groundmaster said:
No. The statistic clearly shows that of the 600 + ppl that got into a firefight the ones that where armed had a 4.5 times higher chance of getting injured and a 4.2 times higher chance of getting killed then the unarmed ones.

Factoring in the times a gun is used to stop a crime does not make any sense whatsoever.
Click to expand...

ohh..... so you're saying if someone were to break into my front door then i should run out the backdoor, which would increase my chances of not getting hurt???

im sorry but im not a lil bitch....


.
 
Groundmaster said:
No. The statistic clearly shows that of the 600 + ppl that got into a firefight the ones that where armed had a 4.5 times higher chance of getting injured and a 4.2 times higher chance of getting killed then the unarmed ones.

Factoring in the times a gun is used to stop a crime does not make any sense whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Hey Ground, don't get sucked in to all this nonsense, leave these guys talk silly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,729
Messages
58,456,338
Members
176,040
Latest member
jaybuff

Share this page

Back
Top