Opinion Are you favorable to organs harvesting of death sentence inmates ?

Hahaha!
Yeah, I'm not a organ donor but that's I donate blood and platelets to make up for it <lmao><lol><Moves>
Not saying you do, but you don't have to tell us all that you don't have anal sex...it's legal to donate blood now :D
 
How many people would executed for supply the demand of fresh organs?
 
That would only happen in a corrupt system, that would neglect justice for profit.

In a corrupt system, you could get death sentenced or incrimined for the rest of your life as an innocent. Inmates could obtain a 7 years period of detention, to allow their lawyers, acquaintainces, and families to prove that they are not guilty.

You can't claim to remove death sentence due to potential mistakes that are a minority. It would be the same as removing jail for all due to potential innocents being framed for crime they did not commit.

There is an urgency in the west, even in those so called developed societies, there are huge list of people waiting to get organs. People whose health is in jeopardy, to save them, would be to bring them organs, and the most moral way to do it is to use the guillotine instead of others methods of execution.
Insert gif of a ship sailing into the distance...
 
So- guillotine them and harvest their organs against their will?

That might fit into cruel and unusual.
 
Unrelated to OP’s magical guillotine capable of killing inmates and hot swapping their corpses out every 18 seconds,

I always liked the idea that you had to be signed up as an organ donor to receive an organ donation should you fall ill. Outside of medical exemptions of course, if you’re healthy and don’t want your guts to be used to save lives then you shouldn’t be allowed to take guts from other people if something of yours is failing.
 
I think its a good idea as long as the inmates agree to it. Like offer them an incentive like more yard time.
 
Who wants inmate organs?!

This isn't a Treehouse of Horror.

hq720.jpg
 
How many people would executed for supply the demand of fresh organs?
The purpose of this policy is not to execute people for the sake of taking their organs, or to execute more people to meet a quota of organs. You are mistaken.

It's very simple, when you kill a criminal X, pe/dofile, terrorist, serial killer, by lethal injection, or by hanging, or by drowning, or whatever method. Instead of that guillotine him, and take his organs to save lives of people waiting for a donator in the waiting list.

That is harmless and painless. Electricity hurts for 8 to 15 seconds, and a lot. Suffocation, and drowning also, it can last more than a minute of pain. Guillotine is the best method of executing a prisoner in the 21 st century, but that is a detail.

I never said that we will execute more prisoners to harvest their organs, not at all. It is about replacing the current used methods, by the guillotine, who is the cheapest, fastest, and among the only method to allow organ harvestings.

Of course, if the inmate is sane.

The goal of using the guillotine as I said before, is not to supply the demand of organs, but obtain organs from the death sentencing of prisoners.
So- guillotine them and harvest their organs against their will?

That might fit into cruel and unusual.
Less cruel than the lethal injection, and the eletric chair, and drowning/suffocation. The guillotine is painless, and swift. Also, the death inmate is dead, it does not change anything for him to have his organs harvested or not.

The inmate in his death, is taken out of the frame, he do not exist anymore in the paint, and others lifes could be saved by his organs. Let's say you have a wife, a daughter, a father, or a brother, or a friend, in need for an organ, hopefully not, but if that was the case, you would perhaps have changed your mind about this field of possibility.

You ok, bud?
Let's say 50 terrorists made a terrorist attack, and you want to execute them. Are you going to waste money to prepare 50 lethal injections, or to bother 50 soldiers to shoot them, when you can use a single guillotine to kill them all of them in less than 10 minutes, and at the same time, obtain their organs if sane.

If you were to have a lot of death sentence inmates, you could kill all of them in a single hour. Just saying. Instead of making them wait for years, or kill one once a month, you could just obtain a gain of time.

Organs of inmates could either help save lifes, or be sold in the market, which would generate money, money that could help the country. You do not gain money out of hanging, out of the electric chair, and out of the lethal injection.

This could save families and change lives. It has just a lot of potential. And also, a country could use organs to give them to foreign people in need, for diplomatic leverage, but let's not go that far.
 
No because the chances an innocent person getting their organs harvested are too high.
It's not a good argument.

First to prevent that, we could offer a seven years period of time, for lawyers, investigators, family's of the inmate, to gather evidence and prove that the innocent is not guilty.

You cannot remove justice, simply because an innocent could die or be jailed for it. That is a risk, that, first, concern an extreme minority, and is second inevitable. Are we going to remove death sentence for 5000 terrorrists, pe/dofiles, serial killers, simply because one innocent was executed. You jus't don't do that.

Are we going to remove jail for 100 000 criminals, big or small offenders, simply because one innocent was incarcerated ? Of course not.

Besides, there are ways to frame an innocent of a crime, by planting false forensics evidence into the crime scene, for example, and others methods, that I cannot talk about, to not give ideas to non desirable people.
 
Not unless they consent.
That won't be hard to get, as the inmates could be bribed with few cheap favors in exchange. A bit more of a food, allow his relatives to visit him, an air gaped computer with a lot of books to read, a music ipod, something like that.

Never gonna be a big deal.

Besides, a death inmate is not gonna need his organs since he is dead. His consent, willingly or unwillingly, did not spare him his life from his execution, why it must spare him his organs.

For sympathy sake ? You must have sympathy for the people on the waiting list, that could be you or one of your family member one day, and not sympathy for a dead body.
 
Besides, a death inmate is not gonna need his organs since he is dead. His consent, willingly or unwillingly, did not spare him his life from his execution, why it must spare him his organs.

For sympathy sake ? You must have sympathy for the people on the waiting list, that could be you or one of your family member one day, and not sympathy for a dead body.
the problem i have with this is opening the door for abuse.
what next? not on death row, but 25 to life guy suddenly "gets ill" and dies in prison. yank his organs too?
soon you'll have a dark industry going on.
i dunno, it sounds like the sort of stuff you hear happening in china or places like that.
 
Back
Top