- Joined
- Oct 27, 2005
- Messages
- 29,019
- Reaction score
- 15,778
also, don't we want exceptional candidates from both parties? is that what we are getting now?
Nope, we have to pick the shinier of two turds
also, don't we want exceptional candidates from both parties? is that what we are getting now?
Singapore? how does a 30 mile long island with a population of 5.5 million people have any direct comparison to the USA?
Hmm. I don't think Singapore is generalizable. The whole world can't be a trading hub and tax haven, and basically, they had a juicy enough setup that the gov't basically couldn't fail.
You're wrong about the left, IMO. The spectrum is defined partly in terms of equality, but I don't think if you asked people what the main goal of governance is, anyone would say "equality." That's just a kind of baseline. And aren't people in modern liberal democracies the healthiest people to have existed, all things considered?
How to make multiculturalism work, for one.
Physically healthiest? No, not even close.
What metrics are you looking at?
Studies of ancient remains, Bronze Age peoples, hunter gatherers, etc.
Also, the average woman now weighs what the average man did in the 60s. People now are fatter and less well nourished, and in poorer physical shape.
If a State feels they have no true representation in the future of the republic as a whole why should they want to continue as part of the Republic. Why not simply secede with any like minded states and form their own union?
What metrics do you get from the studies?
And, yeah, the fact that people are getting heavier seems to be a point in favor of us having a healthier society, though obesity is a problem.
Are you really going to make me go dig up the bone density, strength and modern malnutrition papers.
you're just making things up. The EC is not the bond that binds usCorrect. That is what would happen without the Electoral College. The U.S.A. would have never been formed without it.
you're just making things up. The EC is not the bond that binds us
If you're system is flawed to the point it needs a faithless elector law, perhaps that system is overdue for replacement.Keep the college, but set up federal rules regarding faithless electors.
You cannot allow a rogue activist from either side to disenfranchise the will of the electorate based on a personal decision.
It should accurately reflect the will of the people in that state.