Ank vs Alex 1- weird perception around fight?

Rampage_Jackson

im gay
@Silver
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
10,649
Reaction score
6,407
I see so many people act like it was an easy night for Magomed and its a bit odd. He did great in the 2nd round and won the 4th with wall n stall, but rounds 3 and 5 were super close. You very easily could have scored this 1, 3, 5 for Alex. Ank got the decision via more volume I think. If Alex lets his hands go more he wins that fight. It was a real 50/50 affair for most of the fight and the rematch likely will be the same.
 
I don't even think anyone likes Ank lol. Just a bunch of hipsters who are mad Alex got super popular.

I like both Ankalaev and Alex. Ank has a very smart, composed fighting style that appeals to me greatly. I'd be lying if I said I don't also root for him because he pisses casuals off more than just about anybody so somewhat guilty as charged but I genuinely have nothing against Poatan. He's a class act.
 
Yes, people act like Ankalaev clearly dominated. In reality he won a boring decision that was pretty close.
a definite lack of either guy really going for it. Hopefully we see a more aggressive version of both fighters this weekend
 
The gap from before and this fight skewed the perception. If this happened right after Jan, I think more people would say it was close.

But he looked so dominant against Jiri, Jamahal and even Rountree, despite losing two rounds, that his innefectivness against Ank made him look on a decline while it made his opponent look like a superior fighter who could do what others couldn't.
 
Pereira was carrying uncertainties about him before the octagon door closed, and how the fight actually played out seemed to even justify a lot of them. There were tons of posters around here saying he turned into "unmotivated" Poatan, not training enough, enjoying his newfound fame and wealth, rumours of a broken left hand suggestion came out afterwards, that Ankalaev was criminally underrated, etc, etc, etc.

in my opinion, Alex did seem off before the fight, and he seemed awfully damn hesitant to even try to unload. I never took Ank as a scrub to start with, but honestly, beyond shutting Alex down (similar to how Sean shut Izzy down), Magomed didn't really seem all that impressive. To be honest, the big takeaway from that fight for me was Alex's TDD, he did better than I expected in that department. Alex had also kept a busy schedule and that would have to have taken a toll on him, however, Ankalaev did deserve the win.

I do expect a much different fight this go around, and I don't know if I even want Alex to win the belt back. Almost would rather see him take a stab at HW full-time. Get some highlight reel KO's breaking these fat, slow dudes legs and busting up their pretty faces.
 
Which round did you have him winning easily besides the 2nd and 4th?

It was a close fight scoring-wise but you have to admit that Pereira did zero damage and is only plausibly given rounds literally for leg kicks that had no visible effect, a blocked head kick, and a jab. That's not an exaggeration.
 
It was a close fight scoring-wise but you have to admit that Pereira did zero damage and is only plausibly given rounds literally for leg kicks that had no visible effect, a blocked head kick, and a jab. That's not an exaggeration.
The only real moments of the fight were round 2, sure. Its definitely the least satisfying type of decision where someone closely edges out a couple of rounds and the losing fighter had the best round. I hate MMA scoring but I am just scoring the fight within the parameters I'm given. And within those parameters you can definitely score the fight for Alex. Round 3 was super close and the only round in dispute.

We can say Alex did zero damage but round 4 was the least impactful round & Ank won it with wall n stall and failed takedowns.
 
The only real moments of the fight were round 2, sure. Its definitely the least satisfying type of decision where someone closely edges out a couple of rounds and the losing fighter had the best round. I hate MMA scoring but I am just scoring the fight within the parameters I'm given. And within those parameters you can definitely score the fight for Alex. Round 3 was super close and the only round in dispute.

We can say Alex did zero damage but round 4 was the least impactful round Ank won it with wall n stall and failed takedowns.

I don't understand how the fifth round is assumed to be a clear round for Alex. He literally did 2 things: a jab and a blocked head kick. It was a dull round for sure and I won't pretend Ankalaev did much but it was a toss-up. Third round Alex landed some leg kicks but all the scoring criteria were in Ankalaev's favor.

It was an easy fight for Ankalaev because he walked out of there basically unscathed but round-by-round scoring it was close. I think he'd have done way more damage if Alex opened up and took some chances.

The rematch is definitely intriguing because both guys know they can't afford to be in another snoozer and I think people will understand why Pereira was so tentative in the first fight.
 
Yes, people act like Ankalaev clearly dominated. In reality he won a boring decision that was pretty close.
This pretty much sums up the fight

I'm not arguing Alex won, but only a few small changes would lead to the opposite outcome. So it's not a guarantee Ank strolls to a 2nd win. He may very well do that, but there wasn't a lot in the first fight

Official scorecards were 3 rounds to 2? Pretty accurate
 
It was actually one of those fights where the scorecard make it seem a lot closer than it actually was. Completely one sided fight where Poatan was frozen like a statue in fear after getting lit up in the boxing exchanges, that's why he "didn't let his hands go". Once his leg kick plan didn't work he knew he was fucked because Ank is the better boxer.
 
Back
Top