Andrew Tate arrested

Only if the sex work is illegal like prostitution.

No. The work itself doesn't have to be illegal.

The mere fact that you'te bringing and hosting people to do sex work can be characterized as human ttrafficking if done under emotional manipulation, lies or fraudulent promises. It doesn't need to be forceful or the acts to be illegal, that's how it is seen by many law agencies and anti-trafficking organizarions around the world.

I don't know the Romania laws specitically, since he moved there with the very purpose of law laxity. But unless he can convince the police that all his modus operandi he mentions in many videos is a big fantasy, he is most probably fucked.
 
No. The work itself doesn't have to be illegal.

The mere fact that you'te bringing and hosting people to do sex work can be characterized as human ttrafficking if done under emotional manipulation, lies or fraudulent promises. It doesn't need to be forceful or the acts to be illegal, that's how it is seen by many law agencies and anti-trafficking organizarions around the world.

I don't know the Romania laws specitically, since he moved there with the very purpose of law laxity. But unless he can convince the police that all his modus operandi he mentions in many videos is a big fantasy, he is most probably fucked.

Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion using violence or the threat of violence to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. That's the literal definition.

I'm not sure what he did would constitute that. Maybe Romanian law is different. But we don't know what he actually did or did not do. We don't know what the girls doing the cam shows agreed to. Not yet anyway.

But everyone is just making assumptions of guilt. And I believe they are just assuming because they don't like his online persona or perceive him to be misogynistic.

I don't assume. A anonymous Vice interview means jack shit to me. Vice was doing all these Amber Heard support articles and throwing Depp under the bus even though a lot of the evidence that clearly showed he was the victim was already out in the trial. So I do not trust Vice at all. They have an agenda.

Believe all women is complete horseshit. I need evidence.
 
Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion using violence or the threat of violence to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. That's the literal definition.

I'm not sure what he did would constitute that. Maybe Romanian law is different. But we don't know what he actually did or did not do. We don't know what the girls doing the cam shows agreed to. Not yet anyway.

But everyone is just making assumptions of guilt. And I believe they are just assuming because they don't like his online persona or perceive him to be misogynistic.

I don't assume. A anonymous Vice interview means jack shit to me. Vice was doing all these Amber Heard support articles and throwing Depp under the bus even though a lot of the evidence that clearly showed he was the victim was already out in the trial. So I do not trust Vice at all. They have an agenda.

Believe all women is complete horseshit. I need evidence.

He did say that he rips off women by taking money off them to pay tax and then just keeping it. So I guess that would fit the fraud definition.
 
Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion using violence or the threat of violence to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. That's the literal definition.

I'm not sure what he did would constitute that. Maybe Romanian law is different. But we don't know what he actually did or did not do. We don't know what the girls doing the cam shows agreed to. Not yet anyway.

But everyone is just making assumptions of guilt. And I believe they are just assuming because they don't like his online persona or perceive him to be misogynistic.

I don't assume. A anonymous Vice interview means jack shit to me. Vice was doing all these Amber Heard support articles and throwing Depp under the bus even though a lot of the evidence that clearly showed he was the victim was already out in the trial. So I do not trust Vice at all. They have an agenda.

Believe all women is complete horseshit. I need evidence.

You don't have to believe women.

You can simply trust Andrew Tate, and it would be hard to presume his innocence.
 
Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion using violence or the threat of violence to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. That's the literal definition.
That's integral to the strategy of Tates by their own admission, convincing these girls that they're in a legitimate relationship and once they've been flown over to Romania trying to pressure them into the camgirl service.

As far as threats of violence that remains to be seen though there are some text messages that might suggest this was the case. It seems that the girls would monitor each other and if that failed there was security in place to control their movements.
But everyone is just making assumptions of guilt. And I believe they are just assuming because they don't like his online persona or perceive him to be misogynistic.
This is true to some extent but its also the case that from what we know there's good reason to believe he's guilty.

There was a huge mainstream backlash against these guys based on their messaging and content which, while at times cringe and crass, didn't seem to warrant the attention and seriousness granted to it by wider society. That said if these guys are indeed guilty it would kind of vindicate the critics.

Personally I enjoyed some of the shorts that came out of the Tate sphere and while I generally didn't care for their lifestyle and message I found the bond between the brothers endearing. Some of their shorts are just the two of them goofing off and on some level it reminded me of how I goof off with my own brothers who I'm very close with. Certainly if I were to commit such a crime I would have my brothers as my key accomplices, wouldn't trust anyone else and it seems like the Tates are the same.
 
No. The work itself doesn't have to be illegal.

The mere fact that you'te bringing and hosting people to do sex work can be characterized as human ttrafficking if done under emotional manipulation, lies or fraudulent promises. It doesn't need to be forceful or the acts to be illegal, that's how it is seen by many law agencies and anti-trafficking organizarions around the world.

I don't know the Romania laws specitically, since he moved there with the very purpose of law laxity. But unless he can convince the police that all his modus operandi he mentions in many videos is a big fantasy, he is most probably fucked.
In fairness I don't think the content of the Tates admitting to this in podcasts or other internet content is sufficient evidence for a conviction, the prosecution would have to offer up a lot more evidence to prove their case. But if they do produce such evidence then it makes those videos all the more damning.
 
Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion using violence or the threat of violence to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. That's the literal definition.

I'm not sure what he did would constitute that. Maybe Romanian law is different. But we don't know what he actually did or did not do. We don't know what the girls doing the cam shows agreed to. Not yet anyway.

But everyone is just making assumptions of guilt. And I believe they are just assuming because they don't like his online persona or perceive him to be misogynistic.

I don't assume. A anonymous Vice interview means jack shit to me. Vice was doing all these Amber Heard support articles and throwing Depp under the bus even though a lot of the evidence that clearly showed he was the victim was already out in the trial. So I do not trust Vice at all. They have an agenda.

Believe all women is complete horseshit. I need evidence.
If Johnny Depp claimed he was a sexist and misogynist who had fuck you money and said he was moving to some eastern European backwater because it was easier to get away with corruption there and he was less likely to be charged with rape, then was actually arrested and charged with human trafficking and rape (along with other members of his alleged organized crime group), and had multiple alleged victims speaking out against him, maybe the cases would be more analogous to each other.

Amber Turd is one person and her being a liar really doesn't have much to do with this case.
 
Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion using violence or the threat of violence to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. That's the literal definition.

What he supposedly does to his "girlfriends" falls into the fraud and coercion categories of the international definition of sex trafficking.

ACT_infographic.jpg

"The crime of human trafficking consists of three core elements: the act, the means, the purpose. Physical and sexual abuse, blackmail, emotional manipulation, and the removal of official documents are used by traffickers to control their victims."
https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/crime.html
--
"Definition of Trafficking in Persons
The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7102), defines “severe forms of trafficking in persons” as:

Sex trafficking: the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting of a person for the purpose of a commercial sex act, in which the commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age;..."

"Fraud includes false promises regarding employment, wages, working conditions, love, marriage, or better life. Over time, there may be unexpected changes in work conditions, compensation or debt agreements, or nature of relationship."

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/otip/fact-sheet/resource/fshumantrafficking
__



I'm not sure what he did would constitute that. Maybe Romanian law is different. But we don't know what he actually did or did not do. We don't know what the girls doing the cam shows agreed to. Not yet anyway.

We don't know what he did. But if he did as he says in some videos, it falls exactly under the international definitions of human trafficking. We don't know how lax Romanian laws are, but being part of EU I'd bet they don't differ too much.

And their agreement is mostly irrelevant if done under fraudulent circunstances.

"Victims are forced, defrauded, or coerced into trafficking. Even if victims initially offer consent, that consent is rendered meaningless by the actions of the traffickers to exploit them for labor, services, or commercial sex."
(From the link above.)

But everyone is just making assumptions of guilt. And I believe they are just assuming because they don't like his online persona or perceive him to be misogynistic.

I don't assume. A anonymous Vice interview means jack shit to me. Vice was doing all these Amber Heard support articles and throwing Depp under the bus even though a lot of the evidence that clearly showed he was the victim was already out in the trial. So I do not trust Vice at all. They have an agenda.

I know there is a wide range of opinions and assumptions in the thread, but I'm not talking about Vice, and didn't even read the interview. My commentary works under the premise that what Tate himself says in his video is true. His described modus operandi does characterize human trafficking as defined above. If it was just a stunt for views, then good luck to him because the self incrimination is damning.

Believe all women is complete horseshit. I need evidence.

Fully agreed.
 
In fairness I don't think the content of the Tates admitting to this in podcasts or other internet content is sufficient evidence for a conviction, the prosecution would have to offer up a lot more evidence to prove their case. But if they do produce such evidence then it makes those videos all the more damning.

Sure, but the videos are a huge starting point.

Anyway, the Romanian authorities have 6 months to build their case.
 
Sure, but the videos are a huge starting point.

Anyway, the Romanian authorities have 6 months to build their case.
The videos are certainly not a good look but it seems the starting point was relating to an American woman whose parents called the American embassy in Romania in spring 2022 in regards to her having been allegedly trafficked. Some text logs from this woman have been leaked by both sides and looking at the full logs it doesn't look good for the Tates.
 
LMAO at this kid.

His profile description is "sex haver, boobie lover."






At least he has the excuse that he's a kid. The 50 year olds in here falling for Tate's shit is even worse.

I'd bet he's lying about at least one of those maybe both ...
Why are you guys doxing and making fun of a little kid?
 
Why are you guys doxing and making fun of a little kid?
Doxing lol gtfo of here with that bullshit

Posting someone's tweet is doxing now...
hysterical-laughter.gif


doxing
/ˈdäksiNG/
noun
the action or process of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent


Now show us your definition...
 
What he supposedly does to his "girlfriends" falls into the fraud and coercion categories of the international definition of sex trafficking.

ACT_infographic.jpg

"The crime of human trafficking consists of three core elements: the act, the means, the purpose. Physical and sexual abuse, blackmail, emotional manipulation, and the removal of official documents are used by traffickers to control their victims."
https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/crime.html
--
"Definition of Trafficking in Persons
The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7102), defines “severe forms of trafficking in persons” as:

Sex trafficking: the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting of a person for the purpose of a commercial sex act, in which the commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age;..."

"Fraud includes false promises regarding employment, wages, working conditions, love, marriage, or better life. Over time, there may be unexpected changes in work conditions, compensation or debt agreements, or nature of relationship."

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/otip/fact-sheet/resource/fshumantrafficking
__





We don't know what he did. But if he did as he says in some videos, it falls exactly under the international definitions of human trafficking. We don't know how lax Romanian laws are, but being part of EU I'd bet they don't differ too much.

And their agreement is mostly irrelevant if done under fraudulent circunstances.

"Victims are forced, defrauded, or coerced into trafficking. Even if victims initially offer consent, that consent is rendered meaningless by the actions of the traffickers to exploit them for labor, services, or commercial sex."
(From the link above.)



I know there is a wide range of opinions and assumptions in the thread, but I'm not talking about Vice, and didn't even read the interview. My commentary works under the premise that what Tate himself says in his video is true. His described modus operandi does characterize human trafficking as defined above. If it was just a stunt for views, then good luck to him because the self incrimination is damning.



Fully agreed.
Perfect post
 
Doxing lol gtfo of here with that bullshit

Posting someone's tweet is doxing now...
hysterical-laughter.gif


doxing
/ˈdäksiNG/
noun
the action or process of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent


Now show us your definition...
You posting tweets of a little kid to other platforms and being a spiteful dick to him.


“publishing identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent”


He’s just a kid, but you twats want a man to rot in jail with no conviction or proof. So I shouldn’t be surprised at your disgusting behavior.
 
You posting tweets of a little kid to other platforms and being a spiteful dick to him.


“publishing identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent”


He’s just a kid, but you twats want a man to rot in jail with no conviction or proof. So I shouldn’t be surprised at your disgusting behavior.
How old is he ?

He says he has a credit card so that would make him at least 18

But go ahead and freak out
 
You posting tweets of a little kid to other platforms and being a spiteful dick to him.


“publishing identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent”


He’s just a kid, but you twats want a man to rot in jail with no conviction or proof. So I shouldn’t be surprised at your disgusting behavior.

Doxing would be posting personal details about him. This isn't really doxing, it's making fun of him for posting stupid shit.
 
Doxing would be posting personal details about him. This isn't really doxing, it's making fun of him for posting stupid shit.
Ok so I mistakenly confused doxing with cyber bullying a little kid, which is fucking worse.
 
I believe he wasn’t holding them against their will. We just have to wait and see.

Now the loverboy method, which by the way is a highly vague accusation. You have people on this thread that won’t shut the fuck up about manipulation without any regard to the possibility that the women could just be thots. It’s ok to be a thot, but stop acting like all women are innocent angels.
Tell us more about your jacked body and 9 inch dick...
 
Back
Top