- Joined
- Nov 10, 2005
- Messages
- 14,102
- Reaction score
- 116
Just admit what you did, Andy.
Crazy how rare it is to see Andy threads now a days.
Perhaps look for a 6 year old child somewhere who is on your intellectual level; I'm sure they can explain things to you.
seriously...you still see 2-3x as many GSP threads still.
you mean he bought himself some time so that he could hire a team of experts to build his case?
I think that's about as likely as Wanderlei's claims that everything was smoothed out with AC.
Was the inconsistency that they didn't find everything so the test is unreliable?
Like those 3 police officers who raided the MJ dispensary, destroyed the cameras, missed one, and are saying the camera catching them eating the pot brownies can't be used against them because they thought they destroyed all the cameras so they had an expectation of privacy.
holy shit...hadnt heard about that. happened in OC too. and some people wonder why other people hate cops.
these guys didn't even kill any unarmed people. discussing punching a woman in a wheelchair, stealing edibles and then asking for the footage to be thrown out is despicable.
i dont think his name will ever be completely clear
he doesnt understand how much his failed test hurt us all
but it would help...
anderson has a big name
i wouldnt be surprised if they manage a way to nullify the positive tests
I think he'll be back too, but mostly because he's delayed the hearings so long that there won't be a lot of time left on his suspension anyways.
Well, I guess we'll find out. But no strategy has ever worked better with athletic commissions than admitting fault and begging for mercy.
I doubt they're going to want a Johnnie Cochrane show.
The NAC is not known for admitting fault or really doing anything but following standard protocol. Even if I thought Anderson had a strong case, which it doesn't seem like he does, I would never expect the NAC to err on the side of reason. They will always follow standard procedure, which is a suspension.
He failed the pre-fight test and they still let him fight Diaz, so they could fine Anderson for their biggest paycheck and on top of that tax the UFC on that big-draw money.
True, didn't really think of that. However, he failed 2 tests--they could give him 2 sentences and even though it was before the new policies they could use that as a guideline and throw the book at him...3 years for the first, 4 for the second. 7 yearseses.
The commission did let him fight after failing the pre-fight test.
keep that in perspective.