- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 42,374
- Reaction score
- 6
The point is to avoid this
![]()
Japan, Russia, Saudi Arabia and a few others. It is not blatantly on racial grounds, Japan doesn't say "we only take japanese people as citizens" but in practice they do, once in a while they give citizenship to a high achieving westerner, while any idiot with japanese ancestry can migrate there.
Japan now is one of the safest countries on earth, there are no terrorists, no cartels, no riots, no BLM.
I'd ask the reverse question, what is the point to let in non-white/east asian/ people into a country? I mean from a large scale point of view, sure bringing in some physicist from pakistan is good but that could still happen on a case by case basis.
Take France, for example, outside of sports and food the 10% muslim population didn't bring anything worth their cost in increased crime and terrorism.
In the USA, blacks aren't really immigrants but anyway, outside of sports and music they have very rarely contributed anything substantial compared to the enormous amount of crimes they commit and the amount of welfare they need.
You can cite some outliers like Neil deGrasse or Ben Carson, but they aren't enough to tip the balance.
So you think that race inherently dictates behavior?