- Joined
- Nov 21, 2021
- Messages
- 1,653
- Reaction score
- 1,254
3Nah Izzy won this one. But he lost the first four.
3Nah Izzy won this one. But he lost the first four.
Alex was on the way to knocking out Izzy. Izzy was getting walked down he was stumbling over those leg kicks in a other round or 2 Alex would have knocked him out again.
Alex got sloppy he got hit with the same sloppy untechnical shot he got caught with last time.
Alex threw the fight he was on way to a dominant win.
Obviously it triggered you...
1) Not everyone speaks English.
2) Not everyone is from America.
3) Not everyone has a solid education.
Get off your high horse.

hehehe if we think about it, almost EVERY single victory is a combination of someone making a mistake and the opponent capitalizing on it.
And while it is obvious if we think on this terms, the sobering conclusion is that this is no win is a fluke... this is just exactly how MMA works.
Both guys train, both guys try to get the other to make a mistake in their defense, and whoever capitalizes, wins...
even on this case Here:
![]()
...if you remember this fight, you will know what I meant!!
Alex was on the way to knocking out Izzy. Izzy was getting walked down he was stumbling over those leg kicks in a other round or 2 Alex would have knocked him out again.
Alex got sloppy he got hit with the same sloppy untechnical shot he got caught with last time.
Alex threw the fight he was on way to a dominant win.
Who could get on the internet and make such an idiot out of themselves?So many mentals
Quoted for ridiculousness sake.Izzy lands a defensive blind haymaker with his eyes closed which just happens to KOs Alex, while he's getting tuned up real good on the fence while losing the fight in a similar manner to the first one...
Looks a bit scripted, with the UFC now merging with WWE, it's possible

Right, but that is kind of twisting logic into a pretzel. It was Alex's strategy that didn't work, and the fight would look different when Alex fought different. They have fought several times (with very different fights and different results), and it doesn't fit to say that Alex should repeat the fight that he lost in order to win in the future. I doubt the next fight will look just like the last one; that's not the way their fights have patterned out.He most certainly did win and it's on Alex for getting over aggressive... On the other hand, for Izzy that's not really a gameplan you can use more than once... Getting beat up and then countering when your opponent thinks you are done isn't the smartest move and likely wouldn't work if they were to fight again.
He just needs to stay defensively sound and he wins imo, also when you fight someobody that many times they are bound to find a way to win. Pacquiao vs Marquez 4 is a good example of that.Right, but that is kind of twisting logic into a pretzel. It was Alex's strategy that didn't work, and the fight would look different when Alex fought different. They have fought several times (with very different fights and different results), and it doesn't fit to say that Alex should repeat the fight that he lost in order to win in the future.
OK, but again that is only looking through the prism of the last fight. Alex wouldn't have won the previous fights with Izzy if he had "just stayed defensive." He needed to get a KO to win because Izzy was likely outpointing him. We will see what the next rematch will look like if they have one.He just needs to stay defensively sound and he wins imo, also when you fight someobody that many times they are bound to find a way to win. Pacquiao vs Marquez 4 is a good example of that.
a fourth fight would result in the rivalry being 3 - 1 or 4 - 0 and izzy fans will still say izzy is better.
![]()