What is the proper methodology to accurate assess the attractiveness of fighters?

UFCBlackbelt

Green Belt
Joined
Aug 23, 2017
Messages
1,137
Reaction score
248
Is there a specific formula?

Do we account for variation in gender? For example, its arguable that the standard for attractive men in MMA is higher than attractive women given the relatively low barrier to entry for women.

Is it a comparitive analysis? For example, do we go

"On a men's scale, Yoel is a solid 9 and therefore XYZ compares below Yoel and, as such, must be below a 9"

Please provide your reasonings in a detailed response
 
For example, its arguable that the standard for attractive men in MMA is higher than attractive women given the relatively low barrier to entry for women.

Don't quite follow the reasoning here. Isn't the criticism towards a lot of WMMA fighters entering the UFC that they're attractive, but not very talented fighting wise, so they're basically chosen for looks and not fighting skills?
 
I think it rests with what the individual personally finds attractive. One persons 9 is another persons 4.
 
you jack it

if you can jack it to the same person after 3 back to back jacks then the person is highly attractive
 
you jack it

if you can jack it to the same person after 3 back to back jacks then the person is highly attractive

How many times have you jacked it to your gif, using that exact hand motion?
 
Male fighters are gonna be objectively more attractive than female fighters because masculine features make you physically stronger and better at fighting e.g Broader shoulders means you’re able to generate more torque. Look at Nunez for example. You’d probably think that was a bloke if you saw her in a dark alley - really broad shoulders and skinny hips, batman chin so she can take a shot. These are not feminine characteristics.
 
Don't quite follow the reasoning here. Isn't the criticism towards a lot of WMMA fighters entering the UFC that they're attractive, but not very talented fighting wise, so they're basically chosen for looks and not fighting skills?
I would say most WMMA fighters are not only not talented but also not attractive
 
You're over thinking it bro. If you find someone attractive they're attractive, there's no formula, scale or metric for it.
 
You're over thinking it bro. If you find someone attractive they're attractive, there's no formula, scale or metric for it.

Actually, there's some science to facial symmetry and attractiveness. But I'm with you - attractive is attractive and you can't quantify it. There's some average girls I've found extremely attractive and horny for over the years, and there's been more than a few 8s and 9s that I've found to be completely unappealing for some reason or another.
 
Actually, there's some science to facial symmetry and attractiveness. But I'm with you - attractive is attractive and you can't quantify it. There's some average girls I've found extremely attractive and horny for over the years, and there's been more than a few 8s and 9s that I've found to be completely unappealing for some reason or another.
Yeah there's the symmetry thing and that's understandable it means they have desirable genes. I like fucked up features though Lmao, like weird waist to hip ratio, big lips just shit that's not everyone's cup of tea lol. I don't try to get people to conform to my standard nor do I try or want to conform to theirs. Beauty really is in the eye of the beholder like the old adage says.
 
Is there a specific formula?

Do we account for variation in gender? For example, its arguable that the standard for attractive men in MMA is higher than attractive women given the relatively low barrier to entry for women.

Is it a comparitive analysis? For example, do we go

"On a men's scale, Yoel is a solid 9 and therefore XYZ compares below Yoel and, as such, must be below a 9"

Please provide your reasonings in a detailed response

For too many sherdoggers it's a combination of the kardashians and some multi-racial website

iu

iu
 
Back
Top