Nola213 Purple Belt @purple Joined Oct 19, 2008 Messages 1,679 Reaction score 0 Dec 30, 2012 #81 The judge who gave 30-27 Varner was way worse imo. I though Guillard won 2 rounds to 1. Just look at Varner's face after the decision, complete and utter shock that he won.
The judge who gave 30-27 Varner was way worse imo. I though Guillard won 2 rounds to 1. Just look at Varner's face after the decision, complete and utter shock that he won.
The_Renaissance Sherdog Bunceweight Champion @Titanium Joined Oct 13, 2008 Messages 48,913 Reaction score 31,305 Dec 30, 2012 #82 Yeah, there was some poor judging last night.
Horse Meat Justin Fields Fan Club @purple Joined Oct 27, 2012 Messages 2,070 Reaction score 2 Dec 30, 2012 #83 That209 said: Had this been UFC on Fox 5, one of them would have got a 10-8 round. Click to expand... Melvin probably would've won because of it too.
That209 said: Had this been UFC on Fox 5, one of them would have got a 10-8 round. Click to expand... Melvin probably would've won because of it too.
SuperNerd Playoff Mode. @plutonium Joined Nov 8, 2005 Messages 61,292 Reaction score 10,978 Dec 30, 2012 #84 Nola213 said: The judge who gave 30-27 Varner was way worse imo. I though Guillard won 2 rounds to 1. Just look at Varner's face after the decision, complete and utter shock that he won. Click to expand... Two judges had it 30-27 for Varner.
Nola213 said: The judge who gave 30-27 Varner was way worse imo. I though Guillard won 2 rounds to 1. Just look at Varner's face after the decision, complete and utter shock that he won. Click to expand... Two judges had it 30-27 for Varner.
rerun406 Brown Belt @Brown Joined Feb 4, 2009 Messages 2,936 Reaction score 58 Dec 30, 2012 #86 well all those takedowns by Varner helped him get the decision but either way all judges having it 3 rounds to zero is a head scratcher
well all those takedowns by Varner helped him get the decision but either way all judges having it 3 rounds to zero is a head scratcher
mccallievols Gold Belt Joined Oct 26, 2007 Messages 20,074 Reaction score 0 Dec 30, 2012 #87 i'm calling it a mistake, simply indefensible otherwise