• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social 2024 PotWR semifinals.

Select your favorite candidate. You have one vote. The top two will move on to the final.


  • Total voters
    148
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not a chess match, genius. I bet when I think I have at least a 75% chance of winning, against people who think they are likely to win. Been doing it for a long time, keeping the record for accountability. You lucked out on one, but your prediction record in general is terrible, as are your analyses, because you don't think for yourself. Your whole thing is just personally attacking people you don't see as being in your tribe and blindly repeating GOP talking points.
“lucked out” LMAO

when I’m 3 - 0 will it be luck?
 
He asked if I considered it a rivalry. You love definitions — so by the definitions of a rivalry — it’s not one. That’s because you haven’t won once against me.
I know the question is over your head, and I was asking Lead (who was just trolling anyway, but I'd like to see more substance).
 
“lucked out” LMAO
Yeah, lucked out. Your prediction wasn't that really strong growth would lead to suppliers being caught flat-footed and that Russia would invade Ukraine, leading to supply-chain issues, right? And you predicted that it would continue long past the point when it stopped (and then kept lying about it).
 
Jack is a known liar so it’s no surprise he is leveling these baseless accusations against me.

The record reflects the truth.

Rob Battisti 1
JVS 0

By spring of next year:

Rob Battisti 3
JVS 0
Is the goal here to be PotWR or bet thread champion? Can you serve two masters seeking two prestigious titles? How can you serve the masses while also trying to bet and punish them with your BTC knowledge?

There it is again folks. A politician trying to seek insider access and authority of those he is in competition with. How is this not a conflict of interest? I believe Andy is in the same situation with open bets. Do you really want the PotWR to have prior agreements in place with repetitional stakes? What is they lose and have to do an av of a very frail looking guy. That av would be a reflection of the entire subforum. How could these candidates not have steered clear of unforced errors like this if they had higher ambitions of this office?

Gosh, I don’t know about you all but this is why I’m voting other. They are all corupt, every last one of them.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, lucked out. Your prediction wasn't that really strong growth would lead to suppliers being caught flat-footed and that Russia would invade Ukraine, leading to supply-chain issues, right? And you predicted that it would continue long past the point when it stopped (and then kept lying about it).
Lmao and the next 2 times? Will that be luck?

Sounds like you’re a sore loser. Actually, you simply are a sore loser.

“I lost but here are all the reasons I was actually right and you were wrong!”
 
Is the goal here to be PotWR or bet thread champion? Can you serve two masters seeking two prestigious titles? How can you serve the masses while also trying to bet and punish them with your BTC knowledge?

There it is again folks. A politician trying to seek insider access and authority of those he is in competition with. How is this not a conflict of interest? I believe Andy is in the same situation with open bets. Do you really want the PotWR to have prior agreements in place with reputations stakes? What is they lose and have to do an av of a very frail looking guy. That av would be a reflection of the entire subforum. How could these candidates not have steered clear of unforced errors like this if they had higher ambitions of this office?

Gosh, I don’t know about you all but this is why I’m voting other. They are all corupt, every last one of them.
People like winners. They like those who stand up to a bully — and win! That’s me!
 
Currently in the midst of lies. This is why I had you on ignore
No, it's an actual question. Can you list one lie ever from me?
Lmao and the next 2 times? Will that be luck?

Sounds like you’re a sore loser. Actually, you simply are a sore loser.

“I lost but here are all the reasons I was actually right and you were wrong!”
Your poor reading comprehension and learning disability isn't my problem.
 
What is your understanding of what the exercise is about?
The exercise here is holding the candidates accountable. You may not have noticed but the last thread, this guy admitted to not paying attention for the whole round. This is the guy who want to lead the subforum. Tunes out and reaches his hand out.


Man, I don’t know about you but it’s actions like this that made me vote other this election.
 
i'm not sure who i should be endorsing for this round due to the shenanigans and shameless debauchery going on by the deep state, as well as my endorsement curse.

don't want to give anybody bad juju.
 
The exercise here is holding the candidates accountable.
OK, but skip this dumb stuff and the trolling. What is your understanding of the point of the bet thread or generally of keeping records of bets here?
 
I took everyone off yesterday for the campaign. I had Jack on because he’s a bot and I had you on previous for horrible opinions
But you don't think I'm a bot, obviously. You wouldn't see any value in a harassment campaign against a bot. It just makes you angry to see GOP talking points challenged.
 
But you don't think I'm a bot, obviously. You wouldn't see any value in a harassment campaign against a bot. It just makes you angry to see GOP talking points challenged.
Something a bot would say TBH.

I say no GOP talking points but I could pull up you claiming that about 40-50 times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top