Elections 2020 Democratic Primary Thread: The Announcements

Status
Not open for further replies.
xcvbn said:
She's an important anti-interventionist voice and needs to be heard.
Click to expand...

Er, you might want to look up her history and comments there. She's very far from an anti-interventionist voice. Probably the most hawkish candidate running in the primary ("probably" because there are a few candidates whose foreign policy views I'm not aware of).
 
zebby23 said:
Yes I have heard him talk. He is thoughtful, smart, respectful and knows the issues. 4 things we cannot say for Trump.

Not surprised that your recommendation would be to play a soundbite over and again. You should be a campaign manager with such a winning strategy
Click to expand...

Ufff that’s what you got from his speeches? This guy is so cringe he was beaten by the cringe king himself Ted after being funded up the ass....think about that. He had HUGE amounts of DNC money and support and still lost. The man seriously suggested tearing down existing border defenses and decriminalizing illegal border crossings. Do you agree with this?

This is the most pandering candidate I have seen yet. You know damn well Robert is a fine name for him to use, he uses “his childhood nickname” for a reason. Not to mention bringing out mariachi bands instead of playing the US anthem and apologizing for his race for no reason
 
AlexDB9 said:
Ufff that’s what you got from his speeches? This guy is so cringe he was beaten by the cringe king himself Ted after being funded up the ass....think about that. He had HUGE amounts of DNC money and support and still lost. The man seriously suggested tearing down existing border defenses and decriminalizing illegal border crossings. Do you agree with this?

This is the most pandering candidate I have seen yet. You know damn well Robert is a fine name for him to use, he uses “his childhood nickname” for a reason. Not to mention bringing out mariachi bands instead of playing the US anthem and apologizing for his race for no reason
Click to expand...

Lol ok bud
 
AlexDB9 said:
Ufff that’s what you got from his speeches? This guy is so cringe he was beaten by the cringe king himself Ted after being funded up the ass....think about that. He had HUGE amounts of DNC money and support and still lost. The man seriously suggested tearing down existing border defenses and decriminalizing illegal border crossings. Do you agree with this?

This is the most pandering candidate I have seen yet. You know damn well Robert is a fine name for him to use, he uses “his childhood nickname” for a reason. Not to mention bringing out mariachi bands instead of playing the US anthem and apologizing for his race for no reason
Click to expand...
You have a problem with Beto using his childhood nickname, how did Rafael Cruz become Ted Cruz?
 
zebby23 said:
Lol ok bud
Click to expand...

Seriously though if you believe he would win then you have some agreement with what he’s speaking about right? Do you agree with tearing down border walls and decriminalizing illegals? Try to not but Trump me please
 
AlexDB9 said:
Seriously though if you believe he would win then you have to have some agreement with what he’s speaking about right? Do you agree with tearing down border walls and decriminalizing illegals? Try to not but Trump me please
Click to expand...
Amnesty was a part of both parties immigration reform plan before Trump.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Er, you might want to look up her history and comments there. She's very far from an anti-interventionist voice. Probably the most hawkish candidate running in the primary ("probably" because there are a few candidates whose foreign policy views I'm not aware of).
Click to expand...

That's a bit much. Biden's record is way, way more hawkish, as are Gillibrand's and Booker's. And considering that's kind of just a baseline for centrists who lack principles or espoused interests in foreign policy, I would presume Hickenlooper, Harris, and Klobuchar would be effectively more hawkish.
 
A tiny reality check for worshipers of Saint Bernie of Vermont:
 
58miles said:
A tiny reality check for worshipers of Saint Bernie of Vermont:
Click to expand...


I'm torn between making fun of you for thinking that is relevant and making fun of you for following Dave Weigel.
 
58miles said:
A tiny reality check for worshipers of Saint Bernie of Vermont:
Click to expand...

This is in relation to a lot more candidates.
There are many more options this year. Each candidate will get a smaller share with more candidates.
That said. Can he pull the middle? The libertarian? That's the question.
Trump will have his wako base but after that it is about turnout in the general. Tough road for trump.
 
AlexDB9 said:
Seriously though if you believe he would win then you have some agreement with what he’s speaking about right? Do you agree with tearing down border walls and decriminalizing illegals? Try to not but Trump me please
Click to expand...

I don’t have to agree with all his policies and tearing down the wall to me is issue number 8,458 that I care about. The illegal debate is another story. If you have been here a certain amount of time, contributed to society and haven’t committed a crime then yes. Decriminalize.

I’m not a 1,2 or even 3 issue voter.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Er, you might want to look up her history and comments there. She's very far from an anti-interventionist voice. Probably the most hawkish candidate running in the primary ("probably" because there are a few candidates whose foreign policy views I'm not aware of).
Click to expand...
Besides wanting to kill terrorists, how exactly is she a hawk?
 
Trotsky said:
That's a bit much. Biden's record is way, way more hawkish, as are Gillibrand's and Booker's. And considering that's kind of just a baseline for centrists who lack principles or espoused interests in foreign policy, I would presume Hickenlooper, Harris, and Klobuchar would be effectively more hawkish.
Click to expand...

Not sure what you're referring to with the first batch, and the second sentence doesn't make any sense to me.
 
xcvbn said:
Besides wanting to kill terrorists, how exactly is she a hawk?
Click to expand...

Weird question. You think that Gabbard just thinks that we should kill more terrorists but other people want to kill innocent people?
 
zebby23 said:
I don’t have to agree with all his policies and tearing down the wall to me is issue number 8,458 that I care about. The illegal debate is another story. If you have been here a certain amount of time, contributed to society and haven’t committed a crime then yes. Decriminalize.

I’m not a 1,2 or even 3 issue voter.
Click to expand...

The wall might not be an important issue to you, but tearing down existing barries should alarm you. There is absolutely no benefit to letting God knows what stream into this country freely. This is coming from an immigrant. Again though it’s not about illegals who contribute it’s about just letting them walk through. Seems like a paradise for predators and drug dealers. I know Beto doesn’t mean any of this if he’s being truthful with himself but he’s saying it to pander homie, it’s plain as day

You don’t agree with all his policies you say? you aren’t a 1, 2, 3 issue voter? your MAGA hat is in the mail
 
AlexDB9 said:
@Gooftroop damn this concession stuff does feel good I see why you guys use it
Click to expand...

Oh I just saw this. Sorry, when I start reading nonsense I don’t usually finish. I stopped reading at your first sentence.

I’m going to out on a limb and say you didn’t not attend college? Just a hunch
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,797
Messages
58,318,406
Members
175,998
Latest member
Rosabelot

Share this page

Back
Top