** 2016 Election Day Discussion **

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 457759
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is why I left the left. Everything's about their identities. Everything must be filtered through said identity.

Even if poor white men tilted this for Trump, is that a bad thing? Do they not have value? Besides that conflicts with the whole "white privilege" narrative that's been pushed harder and harder for years now.

22% of Sanders supporters voted for Trump. Good for them.

The Brexit states (Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania) voted for Trump. If someone didn't call these states racist before the election, don't have the damn audacity to call them racist now just because you didn't get your way.

Trump won because of one reason: his stance on trade. That's what won him the Brexit states and ultimately his presidency. Not white supremacy. Not male privilege. Trade.

A wise man once said about election issues "it's the economy, stupid". simple as that
 
I can't believe you re - read the whole thing. I was getting likes from you, in chronological order, the last two days from this thread. At first I was scratching my head, but had a good chuckle once I clued in. Good thread indeed.
Yeah sorry for going all @Wadtucket on you guys. I'm working my way back through this thread and blowing up your notifications with likes. I was too drunk to read through it on election night and too hung over to do much reading the day after the election, so I'm working my way through it now.

I regret nothing. I'm still reveling, giddy with the results of this election.

Besides, my notifications are now over 5,600. THIS IS MY PAYBACK!
 
how does this bitch get 350k views? da fuq is America watching on Youtube?
Quick question....don't think about it...



Who's more likeable? "That bitch", or Hilary Clinton?
 
Yeah sorry for going all @Wadtucket on you guys. I'm working my way back through this thread and blowing up your notifications with likes. I was too drunk to read through it on election night and too hung over to do much reading the day after the election, so I'm working my way through it now.

I regret nothing. I'm still reveling, giddy with the results of this election.

Besides, my notifications are now over 5,600. THIS IS MY PAYBACK!
Ha! Every time you mentioned being unable to look at your notifications I'd give you another "like" and sometimes quote you. Take that! Lol
 
lol trump at 266.
bowarrow.0.gif
New pro-Trump ad criticizes Hillary Clinton for supporting Redskins name change
 
Yeah sorry for going all @Wadtucket on you guys. I'm working my way back through this thread and blowing up your notifications with likes. I was too drunk to read through it on election night and too hung over to do much reading the day after the election, so I'm working my way through it now.

I regret nothing. I'm still reveling, giddy with the results of this election.

Besides, my notifications are now over 5,600. THIS IS MY PAYBACK!
I wouldn't tag Wadtucket and tell him you're going on a like spree, he may snap and have to out-do you
 
I wonder how many elections before a woman is actually elected. It might be decades.
2016

Trump waits till after Christmas to notify SJWs that he identifies as a woman, takes all the glory away from them. They can't say he's not or they'll be transmisogynistic and transphobic, and they'd be force to admit the whole identification thing is a sham.

UqLLBvf.png
 
mike rowe from dirty jobs making sense

A woman named Carol Savoy sent Rowe a question on Facebook:

Hey Mike. You’ve been very quiet. Everything OK? I just wanted you to know that I voted for you. I was also hoping you might explain what the hell happened on Tuesday, and say something to make me feel better about my fellow man. Thanks...

Rowe first offered a metaphor:

Hi Carol,

Last Friday, my dog posted a video that featured a man licking a cat with the aid of a device that’s designed for the specific purpose of making it easier for people to lick their cats. I've been silent ever since, because frankly, I couldn’t think of a better way--metaphorical or otherwise--to express my feelings about this election cycle. The entire country it seems, has been preoccupied with finding a way to lick a cat without actually putting their tongue on it. Too oblique? Too weird? Ok, how about this analysis...

He then talked about the similarities between his hit show, and why Donald Trump was able to resonate so profoundly with millions of Americans:

Back in 2003, a very unusual TV pilot called Dirty Jobs, Forrest-Gumped its way onto The Discovery Channel and found an audience – a big one. For Discovery, this was a problem. You see, Dirty Jobs didn’t look like anything else on their channel. It wasn’t pretty or careful. It took place in sewers and septic tanks, and featured a subversive host in close contact with his 8-year old inner child who refused to do second takes. Everyone agreed that Dirty Jobs was totally “off-brand” and completely inappropriate for Discovery. Everyone but the viewers. The ratings were just too big to ignore, so the pilot got a green-light, and yours truly finally got a steady gig.

But here's the thing - Dirty Jobs didn’t resonate because the host was incredibly charming. It wasn’t a hit because it was gross, or irreverent, or funny, or silly, or smart, or terribly clever. Dirty Jobs succeeded because it was authentic. It spoke directly and candidly to a big chunk of the country that non-fiction networks had been completely ignoring. In a very simple way, Dirty Jobs said “Hey - we can see you,” to millions of regular people who had started to feel invisible. Ultimately, that’s why Dirty Jobs ran for eight seasons. And today, that’s also why Donald Trump is the President of the United States.

Further, Rowe noted that he's worried about the hate being thrown at Trump voters:

I know people are freaked out, Carol. I get it. I’m worried too. But not because of who we elected. We've survived 44 Presidents, and we'll survive this one too. I’m worried because millions of people now seem to believe that Trump supporters are racist, xenophobic, and uneducated misogynists. I'm worried because despising our candidates publicly is very different than despising the people who vote for them.

Last week, three old friends – people I’ve known for years - each requested to be “unfriended” by anyone who planned on voting for Trump. Honestly, that was disheartening. Who tosses away a friendship over an election? Are my friends turning into those mind-numbingly arrogant celebrities who threaten to move to another country if their candidate doesn’t win? Are my friends now convinced that people they’ve known for years who happen to disagree with them politically are not merely mistaken – but evil, and no longer worthy of their friendship?

He explained that this was simply a very dirty job, and someone had to come out on top:

For what it’s worth, Carol, I don’t think Donald Trump won by tapping into America’s “racist underbelly,” and I don’t think Hillary lost because she’s a woman. I think a majority of people who voted in this election did so in spite of their many misgivings about the character of both candidates. That’s why it’s very dangerous to argue that Clinton supporters condone lying under oath and obstructing justice. Just as it’s equally dangerous to suggest a Trump supporter condones gross generalizations about foreigners and women.

These two candidates were the choices we gave ourselves, and each came with a heaping helping of vulgarity and impropriety. Yeah, it was dirty job for sure, but the winner was NOT decided by a racist and craven nation – it was decided by millions of disgusted Americans desperate for real change. The people did not want a politician. The people wanted to be seen. Donald Trump convinced those people that he could see them. Hillary Clinton did not.

Lastly, Rowe offered the same promise to Trump as he did Obama in 2008:

As for me, I’m flattered by your support, but grateful that your vote was not enough to push me over the top. However, when the dust settles, and The White House gets a new tenant, I’ll make the same offer to President Trump that I did to President Obama – to assist as best I can in any attempt to reinvigorate the skilled trades, and shine a light on millions of good jobs that no one seems excited about pursuing.

Like those 3 million “shovel ready” jobs we heard so much about eight years ago, the kind of recovery that Donald Trump is promising will require a workforce that’s properly trained and sufficiently enthused about the opportunities at hand. At the moment, we do not have that work force in place. What we do have, are tens of millions of capable people who have simply stopped looking for work, and millions of available jobs that no one aspires to do. That's the skills gap, and it's gotta close. If mikeroweWORKS can help, we're standing by.

If not, I suppose we'll just have to find another way to lick the cat.
 
This is why I left the left. Everything's about their identities. Everything must be filtered through said identity.

Even if poor white men tilted this for Trump, is that a bad thing? Do they not have value? Besides that conflicts with the whole "white privilege" narrative that's been pushed harder and harder for years now.

22% of Sanders supporters voted for Trump. Good for them.

The Brexit states (Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania) voted for Trump. If someone didn't call these states racist before the election, don't have the damn audacity to call them racist now just because you didn't get your way.

Trump won because of one reason: his stance on trade. That's what won him the Brexit states and ultimately his presidency. Not white supremacy. Not male privilege. Trade.


It was funny to see the MSM blaming blue collar white people for electing Trump.


Ummmm last I checked they're american citizens too? They really wanted to say racist inbred redneck scumbags, and were so frustrated they couldn't say it on the air.


I'm pretty left leaning but a lot of people on that side are really gross now. The far left is as bad as the far right, nobody wants to be labelled as part of either group.


The constantly trying to shame and shout down anyone that disagrees is a douche tactic, and I think people are tired of it and it backfired on them.


Everyone avoids that guy at social gatherings, who wants to be on a team full of that guy? I sure don't.
 
mike rowe from dirty jobs making sense

A woman named Carol Savoy sent Rowe a question on Facebook:

Hey Mike. You’ve been very quiet. Everything OK? I just wanted you to know that I voted for you. I was also hoping you might explain what the hell happened on Tuesday, and say something to make me feel better about my fellow man. Thanks...

Rowe first offered a metaphor:

Hi Carol,

Last Friday, my dog posted a video that featured a man licking a cat with the aid of a device that’s designed for the specific purpose of making it easier for people to lick their cats. I've been silent ever since, because frankly, I couldn’t think of a better way--metaphorical or otherwise--to express my feelings about this election cycle. The entire country it seems, has been preoccupied with finding a way to lick a cat without actually putting their tongue on it. Too oblique? Too weird? Ok, how about this analysis...

He then talked about the similarities between his hit show, and why Donald Trump was able to resonate so profoundly with millions of Americans:

Back in 2003, a very unusual TV pilot called Dirty Jobs, Forrest-Gumped its way onto The Discovery Channel and found an audience – a big one. For Discovery, this was a problem. You see, Dirty Jobs didn’t look like anything else on their channel. It wasn’t pretty or careful. It took place in sewers and septic tanks, and featured a subversive host in close contact with his 8-year old inner child who refused to do second takes. Everyone agreed that Dirty Jobs was totally “off-brand” and completely inappropriate for Discovery. Everyone but the viewers. The ratings were just too big to ignore, so the pilot got a green-light, and yours truly finally got a steady gig.

But here's the thing - Dirty Jobs didn’t resonate because the host was incredibly charming. It wasn’t a hit because it was gross, or irreverent, or funny, or silly, or smart, or terribly clever. Dirty Jobs succeeded because it was authentic. It spoke directly and candidly to a big chunk of the country that non-fiction networks had been completely ignoring. In a very simple way, Dirty Jobs said “Hey - we can see you,” to millions of regular people who had started to feel invisible. Ultimately, that’s why Dirty Jobs ran for eight seasons. And today, that’s also why Donald Trump is the President of the United States.

Further, Rowe noted that he's worried about the hate being thrown at Trump voters:

I know people are freaked out, Carol. I get it. I’m worried too. But not because of who we elected. We've survived 44 Presidents, and we'll survive this one too. I’m worried because millions of people now seem to believe that Trump supporters are racist, xenophobic, and uneducated misogynists. I'm worried because despising our candidates publicly is very different than despising the people who vote for them.

Last week, three old friends – people I’ve known for years - each requested to be “unfriended” by anyone who planned on voting for Trump. Honestly, that was disheartening. Who tosses away a friendship over an election? Are my friends turning into those mind-numbingly arrogant celebrities who threaten to move to another country if their candidate doesn’t win? Are my friends now convinced that people they’ve known for years who happen to disagree with them politically are not merely mistaken – but evil, and no longer worthy of their friendship?

He explained that this was simply a very dirty job, and someone had to come out on top:

For what it’s worth, Carol, I don’t think Donald Trump won by tapping into America’s “racist underbelly,” and I don’t think Hillary lost because she’s a woman. I think a majority of people who voted in this election did so in spite of their many misgivings about the character of both candidates. That’s why it’s very dangerous to argue that Clinton supporters condone lying under oath and obstructing justice. Just as it’s equally dangerous to suggest a Trump supporter condones gross generalizations about foreigners and women.

These two candidates were the choices we gave ourselves, and each came with a heaping helping of vulgarity and impropriety. Yeah, it was dirty job for sure, but the winner was NOT decided by a racist and craven nation – it was decided by millions of disgusted Americans desperate for real change. The people did not want a politician. The people wanted to be seen. Donald Trump convinced those people that he could see them. Hillary Clinton did not.

Lastly, Rowe offered the same promise to Trump as he did Obama in 2008:

As for me, I’m flattered by your support, but grateful that your vote was not enough to push me over the top. However, when the dust settles, and The White House gets a new tenant, I’ll make the same offer to President Trump that I did to President Obama – to assist as best I can in any attempt to reinvigorate the skilled trades, and shine a light on millions of good jobs that no one seems excited about pursuing.

Like those 3 million “shovel ready” jobs we heard so much about eight years ago, the kind of recovery that Donald Trump is promising will require a workforce that’s properly trained and sufficiently enthused about the opportunities at hand. At the moment, we do not have that work force in place. What we do have, are tens of millions of capable people who have simply stopped looking for work, and millions of available jobs that no one aspires to do. That's the skills gap, and it's gotta close. If mikeroweWORKS can help, we're standing by.

If not, I suppose we'll just have to find another way to lick the cat.

Love Mike Rowe.

My brother, an electrician who works in Wyoming and Alaska, sat next to him in coach. He said that Rowe was as real as it gets and was truly interested in his career.
 
wtf a popup box just said that I have 180 new notifications

@Wadtucket did you do that?

I'm still not checking them...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top