- Joined
- Apr 15, 2012
- Messages
- 3,253
- Reaction score
- 154
What I don't understand is why we don't have video replay like in American football so stupid decisions can be reversed.
Lolz. I am semi rustled. Bosnian goal should have counted, and Nigerian goal was foul, so it shouldn't count.
Thank you. That's hilarious.![]()
What I don't understand is why we don't have video replay like in American football so stupid decisions can be reversed.
there is a wide wide range of swear words/expressions in use on balkans (some say most diverse in the world)
that ref experienced all the standard high rage ones.
What I don't understand is why we don't have video replay like in American football so stupid decisions can be reversed.
What I don't understand is why we don't have video replay like in American football so stupid decisions can be reversed.
Nigerian goal was not a foul. Bosnian defender tried to obstruct and then after he was beaten took a dive.
What I don't understand is why we don't have video replay like in American football so stupid decisions can be reversed.
Because that way fixing games would be a lot more difficult.
Easily the most corrupt sport in the world.
There was a lot of contact with the legs. Nigerian dude clearly hit the guys right leg tripping him up. No way it was a dive IMO.
So the Nigerian player tripped the defender while dribbling the ball?
Uummm, m'kay.
What I don't understand is why we don't have video replay like in American football so stupid decisions can be reversed.
You'll see it on the replay. The Bosnian guy tried to body block him when he got between the ball and the nigerian player and then legs collided and the Bosnia guy went down. You'll see a lot of contact, look at the Nigerian's knee going into the Bosnian guys leg.
I don't know the rules of whether that's just incidental contact and a foul or not or whatever, but no way it was a dive.