D
Deleted member 585708
Guest
Honestly dude you still are reaching with the list comment. Or missing the point of the AKC. Its a bit disingenuous to keep saying the list changes constantly.... I'm not trying to be mean. Just trying to be direct and simplify a complicated process.....
I kind of get what you're saying though on the surface level.
However, I feel if you really read how the process worked you would understand its not them changing or instantly adding a breed.
At the end of the day its just back and forth banter. I'm not mad over people I don't know talking trash on the internet about things they don't know.
Here is my take on it (Again):
The list only grows due to there being a world wide backlog of Pure Bred dogs that the AKC has yet to do the appropriate process for admission.
These are already established breeds. Not only that they have gone through years of going through the AKC's FSS process & there rarity group process. While only completing 1 or 2 a year. So these are breeds they have been tracking to for years & anyone who follows the AKC knows what's in the pipeline and the next steps and dates.
So it's literally the opposite of it being "American-centric" like you accused them of. It's them saying they don't know everything under the sun & that there were real dog breeds prior to the AKC being a thing. They are just setting a standard for stuff that was already out there. Or for more modern breeds, a standard that shouldn't allow dogs like the XL Bullies to gain acceptance.
There is a giant difference in accepting American XL Bullies in a registry or club versus an already established pure bred dog and proper working dog such as the Dogo Argentina ( recently added to AKC even though this has been a legit breed for decades.
To your point of "if not recognized today but maybe 20 years later."
The AKC has specific rules that forbid modern crosses of already recognized breeds to create a new "breed." This was specially in the link I sent you.
If any of that changes they will lose their high ground.
I guess a dog breed is more than just crossing dogs for a look in most reputable registries standards.
What I meant when I said "America-centric" is that the assumption that an (read: any) American kennel club is the gold standard, when the Royal Kennel Club in the UK is every bit it's equal, isn't necessarily true.
The RKC, here, has existed for longer, and only has 23 more pedigree breeds by comparison, while being 11 years older.
2 new breeds added to the AKC list each year, well, the math speaks for itself. They're at least on a par in terms of what you'd expect them to recognise and not recognise.
Neither accept the XL Bully. It's not a recognised pedigree breed here, either.
My initial point was that the XL Bully is likely to be outlawed in the UK sooner or later, due to the fact it's the most prolific killer right now. Maybe I'll be proved wrong. We'll have to wait and see.