That's not how it works. You're the one asserting, without evidence, that this was a hate crime. The onus is on YOU to prove that it was, not the other way around.
By the way, I don't support hate crimes laws because it's effectively legislating thought crimes. But unlike you, I understand what hate crimes are and I have a principled stance against them which I apply equally.
Whereas you, with your idiotic white nationalist views, would be perfectly happy if white people were never charged with hate crimes against nonwhites and if nonwhites were always charged with hate crimes when they victimized whites.