He has, to appease and then on his way out gives the middle finger.To be fair Mr President, obummer has done enough cucking for Israel these past 8 years.
We are all secret Muslims deep down. Libz and MuslimsNotice how I said secret Muslim? That is a reference, one that I and @Bald1 know of, to the fact that @In The Name Of calls posters here secret Muslims. I can't remember if he's called me a secret Muslim or not but he has said I engage in taqiyya which is close enough for me.
So ya don't know shit buddy.
Is Tunisia really relevant to this discussion or actually part of the region? The only African country I would consider to meet that criteria would be Egypt. Hell, they even have a relatively large territory in the Middle East (Sinai).Because its the only democracy in the region. Well, was the only democracy until Tunisia democratized but Tunisia's military ain't shit compared to Israel's.
I actually agree with you here, its just that this is often an explanation for our alliance with Israel.
Hopefully to spite MuslimsI can't stand the Islamic faith, but why on earth would anyone support Israel?
Part of MENA more generally but not all that relevant in terms of geopolitics.Is Tunisia really relevant to this discussion or actually part of the region? The only African country I would consider to meet that criteria would be Egypt. Hell, they even have a relatively large territory in the Middle East (Sinai).
One thing is for sure; MEXICO is NOT an ally.
But thanks for your input on the matter, doesn't mean much since Israel IS an ally.
Dumb Arabs shit the bed when they started and lost the six-day war, denied multiple solutions etc
For those nut heads, it's basically part of their raison d'Etat to destroy Israel for their Islamic ummah, add the threat by radical Islamic terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Israel needs to keep an extended line of defense, they need a buffer.
Telling them to 'hand over' those areas is like Germany demanding Szczecin, Gdansk or Alsace-Lorraine to be German again while building a giant army and leaving NATO.
Agreements over borders before the six-day war never were meant as a final solution, that was even part of their contracts.
Palestinians never had a sovereign state which included the West Bank.
There are already many misinformed liberals posting in this thread, claiming that Israel took land away from Palestinians that doesn't belong to them. That's wrong, even from the perspective of those people who say the settlements are 'illegal'.
Huh? Look at the 49 Armistice Agreement
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...49-Armistice-Comparison.svg.png?1482546159002
This thing cutting off the blue Israeli areas is the west bank.
How exactly is this clusterfuck better to defend?
Settlements in the central west bank and eastern of Jerusalem are CLEARLY suitable to improve Israel's defense.
But you still seem to argue about the wrong question anyway. That Israel can continue to occupy those areas isn't really up to debate.
What's up to debate is if they are allowed to move more Israelis to those areas.
Good, because who would want to be an ally with a warmongerer nation?
Lol at calling reagans presidency a reign of destruction
This is one area that Reagan wasn't as bad as bad as most. I would take his war mongering record over both Bushes, Clinton, and Obama.
truer words have never been spokenDon't mind me bro I'm just a liberal cuck what do I know. Carry on my friend.