Yes there is the implied statement in the OP that he has lost the respect of many peopleHe lost my respect when he went driving while stoned and crashed into a pregnant woman who later had a miscarriage. He also fled the scene of the crash.
Respect in what sense?Yes there is the implied statement in the OP that he has lost the respect of many people
The question is what does he have to do to gain it back
Yes there is the implied statement in the OP that he has lost the respect of many people
The question is what does he have to do to gain it back
Because I’m at least 90% sure that in both cases USADA said something to the affect of “Jon Jones in our opinion is not a drug cheat”
As an athleteRespect in what sense?
I think the vast majority of people respect him as a fighter.
Are you asking what will cause people to respect his integrity as a person?
The arbitration panel said that, not USADA.
I laugh when I hear grown men cry about snitching, living by a 13 year old punks code of honor.Well he's walking free on the snitch clause so I can't respect it. Cannot and will not. And he used to snitch on brothers in hs for smoking weed. Been a long time snitch.
You're being pedantic because you misconstrued my point. The independent panel that rules on USADA cases.The arbitration panel said that, not USADA.
And USADA didn't disagree.
“The independent arbitrator found that Jon Jones was not intentionally cheating in this case, and while we thought 18-months was the appropriate sanction given the other circumstances of the case, we respect the arbitrator’s decision and believe that justice was served,” USADA CEO Travis T. Tygart said in a statement. “This case is another strong reminder that athletes need to be extremely cautious about the products and supplements they use to ensure they are free of prohibited substances.”
Yet they gave him four years until he agreed to be an informant.
Thankfully posters like you actually keep up to date on stuff.And USADA didn't disagree.
“The independent arbitrator found that Jon Jones was not intentionally cheating in this case, and while we thought 18-months was the appropriate sanction given the other circumstances of the case, we respect the arbitrator’s decision and believe that justice was served,” USADA CEO Travis T. Tygart said in a statement. “This case is another strong reminder that athletes need to be extremely cautious about the products and supplements they use to ensure they are free of prohibited substances.”
You're being pedantic because you misconstrued my point. The independent panel that rules on USADA cases.