- Joined
- Jun 14, 2008
- Messages
- 17,642
- Reaction score
- 1
I didn't know being a cop was genetic and not a choice
some one else pointed that out.
choice or not on being police, its still lazy to generalize all for the actions of some.
I didn't know being a cop was genetic and not a choice
I'm talking about basic statistical concepts, not interpretation of data to make your point. I expounded in a response to someone else.
You asked how is was even possible, even though it's very obvious why. Care to comment on the matter now? Do you see how the groups are wildly different, and not comparable?how about getting to the point in the first place instead being an ass in what was a non-confrontational disagreement. i'm an ass all the time, i get it, it's fun. but pick your spots a little better.
You asked how is was even possible, even though it's very obvious why. Care to comment on the matter now? Do you see how the groups are wildly different, and not comparable?
Sure. I pick my spots fine. Say something reasonable or interesting and I'll give you a well articulated, thoughtful response.care to answer to what i just wrote?
i also expounded in to another poster.
Sure. I pick my spots fine. Say something reasonable or interesting and I'll give you a well articulated, thoughtful response.
It's got to be pretty bad since the police chief came out and contradicted the officer's story pretty early on this one. Usually they play it close to the vest if there's some chance that the story turns in the officer's favor.
A lot of chiefs won't hesitate to throw an officer under the bus to make themselves look better so I don't put too much into his comments. They're like politicians when it comes to that. The description sound bad, how bad depends on the actual video and the rest of the facts.
I agree with the 1st statement which is why I suspect it's pretty bad. A chief will throw an officer under the bus to make himself look better. But he won't do it if there is a chance that the officer is in the right because throwing an officer under the boss will hurt him with the other officers if it turns out to have been a good shoot.
That's why this chief coming out against his officer so early surprised me, it means that he's seen enough that he thinks it's safer to throw the officer under the bus this early on than stand by him.
And without the bodycam this cop gets away with it completely. The tragedy here is how many other cases over the years happened where police baldly LIED about their shootings and other happenings. You cannot trust the word of cops. All lie for each other.
This is why you're the best cop I know.Do you know how crazy a person would have to be driving, or backing in this case, to warrant shooting at a moving vehicle? You would have to have an officer unable to move out of the way-injured on ground or backed up against a wall. Other than that, you simply move out of the way, or as I suspect-don't position yourself to be at risk in the first place.
Never forget that this is over underage consumption and curfew violations. Neither crime is so heinous that a car chase, tasering, or deadly force should ever be the result of trying to apprehend a party goer.
I called my guys off of a foot pursuit for an underage party just last week. I got in the radio and said "you will end this door pursuit foolishness immediately-this is an underage party call, not some type of violent crime!"
You dont seem to understand what "proven" means. If it were proven the investigation would be over and we'd be moving to trial or no charges filed.The pig lied about shooting an unarmed person in the back of the head, saying je shot because he feared for his life. That is now a proven lie. So he has no reason to have shot that kid, otgerwise he would have, you know, not lied about it in official reports.
Abd what do we call people shooting at random cars for no reason and killing people?
You dont seem to understand what "proven" means. If it were proven the investigation would be over and we'd be moving to trial or no charges filed.
Then the investigation would be over. But it isn't.The pig lied about shooting an unarmed person in the back of the head, saying je shot because he feared for his life. That is now a proven lie. So he has no reason to have shot that kid, otgerwise he would have, you know, not lied about it in official reports.
Abd what do we call people shooting at random cars for no reason and killing people?
You don't seem to understand what logic is either.So im supposed to take the word of the police chief, but not the same chief when he later said that the pigs story didnt matech the bodycam.
Yeah. Theres some logic.