Because some understand the historical context. The Korean peninsula was raided, raped, and terrorized for centuries before the US and USSR decided to make it a poker chip in an international pissing match. They have seen the United States bomb and kill hundreds of thousands in the Philippines, seen them kill hundreds of thousands with nuclear bombs in Japan, and most importantly has seen them push diplomatically for countries to disarm themselves, only to invade and destroy the countries after they comply and in good faith relinquish all weaponry.
They're flexing their sovereignty. It's not like they have actually bombed other countries like we have: if anything they are historically more trustworthy with a nuclear arsenal than we are.
I mean, seriously, North Korea has 1/10th our population, 1/1000th our economy, and 1/10000th our military. And you want to cause the death of millions of people because they are a threat to us? On the basis of verbal proclamations?
This is like something my mom would shared on facebook. It's funny though.
True. History should never get over this completely unique national black eye.
That's a silly, sweeping statement. We hate him more than dictators as a whole, because not all dictators are bad leaders or bad people. And even some of the bad ones are more justifiable by context than Trump: who grew up rich in the world's richest country in history's greatest period of information access.....and still ended up being a willfully ignorant moron piece of shit.
But there are definitely dictators worse than Trump. Al-Saud from Saudi Arabia and Erdogan from Turkey are definitely worse. Although Erdogan is not really a dictator.
Guilty. Only idiots "love" their country unconditionally. You'd rather let your country turn into a anti-intellectual black hole and a murderous international provocateur than question it. That's lazy, not patriotic.