War Drums Start Beating on Iran?

[Quinton Overeem]

US will fall hard if they enter Iran.

That will be one hell of a grave.

That's why the US, Saudi Arabia, and the western allies funded and armed the "moderate" sunni rebels.

 

[Buck Swope]

Your post makes zero sense and contradicts the current political reality, without providing any information.

What info do you have? Ask that Q and you better be able to answer clippy.

 

[Buck Swope]

@Fawlty

 

[Prutfis]

Iran would actually be the best us ally in me.
Gotta suck that sa cock though

 

[Buck Swope]

Iran would actually be the best us ally in me.
Gotta suck that sa cock though

Painfully obvious.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

No, because you consider nearly everything we do to be terrorism, because you're a goddamn froot loop.

Dodge noted

 

[Prutfis]

Painfully obvious.

The Iranian people are some of the most secular in the me. If a peacefully regime change could happen it would be the biggest thing in the me since the Reagan doctrine.
Sa will not allow it though. Us gotta protect Sunni terrorism so they can spend billions fighting sunni terrorism. W00t

 

[Anung Un Rama]

You have yet to provide any reason for Iran having nukes as a bad thing. I like the nuke treaty in that it delays our attacking of another sovereign nation.

Because the fascist is islamic and the islamic is fascist!

 

[SMEAC]

What savages?

Don't be daft

 

[HomerThompson]

It's not a straw man, it's a slippery slope argument, and it's a valid one. Your exception for Iran is that they are deterring aggression by nuclear powers. That applies to other countries who are supposedly under aggression from nuclear powers. If Assad finally snuffs out the civil war, how soon thereafter will he be allowed a HomerThompson permit to pursue nuclear weapons? I'm identifying your standard and applying it.

Iran is being handled well right now too.

Yes it is. You argued against a position that I didn't take. That's the textbook definition of the straw man fallacy. In fact, you also argued against a straw man using a slippery slope argument. Congratulations, you created a fallacious inception. Leo would be proud.

 

[SMEAC]

Are you trying to say we officially declared war on Iraq for oil? Source?

Daft again

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Don't be daft

We're talking about Iran. Their people aren't ISIS, bro.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Daft again

Dodge noted.

 

[SMEAC]

We're talking about Iran. Their people aren't ISIS, bro.

LOL at anyone in SW Asia being progressive

 

[SMEAC]

Dodge noted.

Motherfucker you are the one that thinks war has nothing to do with resources and you are accusing me of dodging...GTFO

 

[HomerThompson]

LOL at anyone in SW Asia being progressive

So, is it your position that all the people in dozens of countries are awful, and that we have the right to take their resources because we can?

 

[Anung Un Rama]

LOL at anyone in SW Asia being progressive

Big leap from progressives to ISIS....

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Motherfucker you are the one that thinks war has nothing to do with resources and you are accusing me of dodging...GTFO

Nah, dude. You mistake me. I know it was at least partially for resources, which doesn't excuse it, but that is not the official reason we went to war, is it? The official reason was WMD and links to AQ, which were lies.

 

[SMEAC]

So, is it your position that all the people in dozens of countries are awful, and that we have the right to take their resources because we can?

You're the one saying take resources, don't try and attribute your trite arguments to people

They are awful though, and you are being intellectually dishonest if you say otherwise

 

[SMEAC]

Nah, dude. You mistake me. I know it was at least partially for resources, which doesn't excuse it, but that is not the official reason we went to war, is it? The official reason was WMD and links to AQ, which were lies.

Back to being daft