R
ripskater
Guest
I'm don't think we've put a man there. So I don't think we're going "again."
We have no technology to do anything but small scale mining and construction on the moon. Even if the most expensive metals and minerals were available in their pure form laying on the surface, it would cost several times their worth to bring them back to earth. There is no water, fuel or air that is needed to process things into usable forms.
The reason we went to the moon in the first place was mainly to prove that we could in a dick measuring contest with the Soviet Union in the space race. We needed humans to operate the equipment but we might have been able to do it with robotic landers. Now we definitely have the technology to do it without humans. We learned a lot about the moon and the earth from the samples brought back but we found we didn't have much more to learn. The moon is basically a chunk of the earth so precious metals and minerals won't be any easier to find than they are on earth.
Was Ken Shamrock vs Rich Franklin a work?I'm don't think we've put a man there. So I don't think we're going "again."
Because you don't believe anything unless a youtube video says it. Leave it up to the biggest God nuthugger around here to take the word of lesser educated individuals over verified history.I'm don't think we've put a man there. So I don't think we're going "again."
Really?
Interesting since space exploration does further technology development quite a bit(especially material science could benefit).
But I would prioritize lowering the annual deficit significantly first.
I'd be curious to see how this all develops
Watch out, I’ve heard that an old German dude lives on the dark side of the moon...
nobody's been to the moon in the past 45 yrs.
why the sudden interest?
I don't think it even exists. Probably just a hologram projected by reptilians.I'm don't think we've put a man there. So I don't think we're going "again."