UN draft resolution on Syria attack: Vote fails with Russia veto, China abstains

So, Russia can attack and occupy countries just because Russia/USSR/Russian Empire was in union with said countries at some moment of their history? About Russia and NATO - Russia is one country and there is many countries in NATO. It's kinda like asking why you can't kill people but the government can execute criminals.

that makes no sense. i get youre an american shill but at least try to make so sense.

All those states post Soviet Union were formed during Soviet Union n their territory was established while they were in Soviet Union.

So you can't on one hand want out of Soviet Union, but at the same time expect to keep all the territory gained while part of the union.

For the 2nd part...

That's the best you got? Well Russia is technically a federation , but even then how's NATO above the law all of a sudden?

They are supposed to abide by international laws n un resolutions. It doesn't matter if it's one or 100 countries. The moment you break international law, you lose credibility n can no longer complain about others doing the same
 
-Says the guy pushing the lie russia didnt invade the ukraine lol

-in nato matters no ..in everything else free as a bird,not so much if russia invades
The agreement doesnt stop coubtries asking to be members ...again u dont grasp this they arent russian property[/QUOTE]

Again you're just talking outta your ass. Where's your proof? Your corporate media fabrication?

If Russia really was involved in the conflict Russia would be bordering Poland on both sides right now
 
Back
Top