Sure, like I said, DC vs. Brock isn't THE MOST legitimate title fight in the UFC, but it's at least to 10-20, whereas title fights at flyweight, FW, LW etc. are not even top 100 in terms of legitimacy, because while there might be 1-2 guys in the UFC who can beat DC, and 10-20 guys who can beat Brock, there're literally hundreds of guys who can beat the flyweight, featherweight and LW champions, so if you're gonna rag on the illegitimacy of DC vs. Brock, why not rag on the illegitimacy of them all? Ortega vs. Hollowords is 10x less legitimate, DC and Brock would ragdoll them both, but did you have a problem with that?
So? Fighting is a combination of skill and strength and size and stamina and mental fortitude and etc. etc. It's not about any one single thing, but rather the combination of all attributes. All that matters is Brock is a better FIGHTER than MM, TJ, Hollowords and 99% of the fighters in the UFC, because he can beat them in a fight. Therefore he is actually far more legitimate than any of these so-called "champions" and their challenges in lower weight classes. The only reason weight classes exist is for entertainment and business, because without them there would be no Conor McGregor no GSP no little entertaining guys competing. Flyweight is not the only illegitimate division, all weight classes up to MW are illegitimate, and the LHW champion walks around at HW anyway.
Not at all, because I don't give 2 shits about legitimacy in MMA, I want entertainment and popcorn, all I'm doing is showing you how hypocritical it is to shit on the legitimacy of DC vs. Brock when it is actually more legitimate than 95% of UFC title fights including ones everyone has been clamoring for like BJ vs. GSP "superfight" back in the day and Ferguson vs. Khabib. Brock would eat all 4 of them for breakfast, he's far more legit than anyone GSP, Ferguson or Holloway had ever fought.