- Joined
- May 19, 2008
- Messages
- 29,859
- Reaction score
- 1,261
The truth is, this debate still goes on by people much smarter and educated on the subject. We can both make our argument, but I still don't believe it is completely answered.Those posts also explain the evolution of nullification and debunk as well as show that secession was a revolutionary right (won through war) and not a constitutional right.
It also shows that the South were Nationalist when it suited them and state's rights when it didn't.
The US was not a loose collection of states that were free to secede. It was a United nation whose means of remedies between state's and the nation was the courts.
Their only right to secession was might which they lacked.
On one hand, you believe in the "perpetual union" theory. However that was just a theory as it wasn't part of the Constitution.
I believe in the "compact theory" and I take the 10th Anendnent literally. However, it isn't covered either.
In the end, Texas vs. White closed the door on it and the victors made the rules.
But the fact that Jefferson Davis was imprisoned for 2 years while the Union lawyers worked to find a way to prosecute him, yet could find no legal grounds to do so, also proves my point.
So, of course, in the end, the victors got to make the rules and write the history, but at the time of war, me, along with many others, believe the South had every right to secede.