- Joined
- Oct 18, 2005
- Messages
- 15,274
- Reaction score
- 2
I understand the argument that the rich don't use shops with minimum wage staff and thus the cost is passed on to the customer base who does use the establishments and that is usually the lower economic folks as well BUT I don't like the idea that these companies make hundreds of millions in profits while the worker is also getting government assistance to eek out a living.
IIRC there is a ridiculous amount of Walmart employees who get SNAP benefits. So taxpayers are subsidizing Walmart to allow owners to rake in billions. Without the government providing the SNAP benefits the employees couldn't survive working at the current wages and either Walmart would have to pay them more, cutting into their profits, or go out of business due no not having any/enough employees.
IIRC there is a ridiculous amount of Walmart employees who get SNAP benefits. So taxpayers are subsidizing Walmart to allow owners to rake in billions. Without the government providing the SNAP benefits the employees couldn't survive working at the current wages and either Walmart would have to pay them more, cutting into their profits, or go out of business due no not having any/enough employees.