MYTHS v. FACTS: Cal State Professor Explains Border Situation

luckyshot

Nazi Punks Fuck Off
Platinum Member
Joined
May 11, 2016
Messages
16,971
Reaction score
11,167
This post is circulating social media. It is by Michelle Martin, PhD., Professor at Cal State Fullerton. It is worth reading (if you care about facts):

There is so much misinformation out there about the Trump administration's new "zero tolerance" policy that requires criminal prosecution, which then warrants the separating of parents and children at the border. Before responding to a post defending this policy, please do your research...As a professor at a local Cal State, I research and write about these issues, so here, I'll make it easier for you:

Myth: This is not a new policy and was practiced under Obama and Clinton - FALSE. The policy to separate parents and children is new and was instituted on 4/6/2018. It was the brainchild of John Kelly and Stephen Miller to serve as a deterrent for undocumented immigration, approved by Trump, and adopted by Sessions. Prior administrations detained migrant families, but didn’t have a practice of forcibly separating parents from their children unless the adults were deemed unfit. https://www.justice.gov/…/press-rele…/file/1049751/download…

Myth: The Democrats caused this, "it's their law." FALSE. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats caused this, the Trump administration did (although the Republicans could fix this today, and have refused). I believe what this myth refers to is the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, which were both passed under Clinton in 1996. These laws essentially made unauthorized entry into the US a crime (typically a misdemeanor for first-time offenders), but under both Republicans and Democrats, these cases were handled through civil deportation proceedings, not a criminal proceeding, which did not require separation. And again, even in cases where detainment was required, families were always kept together in family residential centers, unless the parents were deemed unfit (as mentioned above). Thus, Trump's assertion that he hates this policy but has no choice but to separate the parents from their children, because the Democrats "gave us this law" is false and nothing more than propaganda designed to compel negotiation on bad policy. https://www.independent.co.uk/…/trump-democrats-us-border-m…

Myth: The parents and children will be reunited shortly, once the parents' court cases are finalized. FALSE. Criminal court is a vastly different beast than civil court proceedings. Also, the children are being processed as unaccompanied minors ("unaccompanied alien children"), which typically means they are sent into the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHS). Under normal circumstances when a child enters the country without his or her parent, ORR attempts to locate a family member within a few weeks, and the child is then released to a family member, or if a family member cannot be located, the child is placed in a residential center (anywhere in the country), or in some cases, foster care. Prior to Trump's new policy, ORR was operating at 95% capacity, and they simply cannot effectively manage the influx of 2000+ children, some as young as 4 months. Also, keep in mind, these are not unaccompanied minor children, they have parents. There is great legal ambiguity on how and even whether the parents will get their children back because we are in uncharted territory right now. According to the ACLU lawsuit (see below), there is currently no easy vehicle for reuniting parents with their children. Additionally, according to a May 2018 report, numerous cases of verbal, physical and sexual abuse were found to have occurred in these residential centers. https://www.aclu.org/…/aclu-obtains-documents-showing-wides…

Myth: This policy is legal. LIKELY FALSE. The ACLU filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on 5/6/18, and a recent court ruling denied the government's motion to dismiss the suit. The judge deciding the case stated that the Trump Administration policy is "brutal, offensive, and fails to comport with traditional notions of fair play and decency." The case is moving forward because it was deemed to have legal merit. https://www.bloomberg.com/…/aclu-suit-over-child-separation…

Myth: This is the only way to deter undocumented immigration - FALSE. Annual trends show that arrests for undocumented entry are at a 46 year low, and undocumented crossings dropped in 2007, with a net loss (more people leaving than arriving). Deportations have increased steadily though (spiking in 1996 and more recently), because several laws that were passed since 1996 have made it legally more difficult to gain legal status for people already here, and thus increased their deportations (I address this later under the myth that it's the Democrats' fault). What we mostly have now are people crossing the border illegally because they've already been hired by a US company, or because they are seeking political asylum. Economic migrants come to this country because our country has kept the demand going. But again, many of these people impacted by Trump's "zero tolerance" policy appear to be political asylum-seekers. https://www.npr.org/…/arrests-for-illegal-border-crossings-…
 
Listening to the opinions of a woman.... hahahaha
 
Myth: Asylum seekers from Mexico and Central America are fleeing war. There are no wars going on there. Syrians are fleeing war and are actual asylum seekers as their country is being bombed to shit.

Wanting to leave your shithole country does not make you an asylum seeker.
 
I really don’t care.

Even though it's pretty obvious who does and does not care about the truth, it is refreshingly honest to hear one of them actually admit that truth means nothing to them.
 
university phd? cant be trusted.

find a WWE star ts, and maybe someone will listen.
 
Even though it's pretty obvious who does and does not care about the truth, it is refreshingly honest to hear one of them actually admit that truth means nothing to them.
Wanting to move to the us doesn’t make you an asylum candidate. Send them back and let them follow the process like they’re supposed to
 
Myth: PHD cited in article is impartial and non biased
 
In these kinds of situations the southern and middle America welfare states need to stfu and let Cali handle this. We have all the money and power.
 
Myth: PHD cited in article is impartial and non biased
translations: this guy contradicts my inner bias so I'm going to disregard it as fake instead of thinking critically.
 
Myth: Only the best and brightest from Central and South America illegally enter the US knowing their children will be taken from them.
 
In these kinds of situations the southern and middle America welfare states need to stfu and let Cali handle this. We have all the money and power.

so you want to give full control of immigration to 1 state...jesus you're a fucking wacko
 
First, PhD from Cal State Fullerton. Fuck off.
Second, she vaguely looks at the myth vs. fact questions to suit her own opinions.
Third, it is a myth that all these kids are coming here with their parents. Fact, A large percentage are with smugglers/coyotes and some and some are even being sold as sex slaves.
Lastly, I love that kids are somehow traumatized so much from being separated from their parents but somehow they are fleeing for their lives from a war torn country or the animals of ms-13 and are able to make a thousand mile plus journey to seek asylum.
 
Listening to the opinions of a woman.... hahahaha
I really don’t care.
Just remember these responses the next time someone tries to say Trumpism isn't thriving off of, empowering, and emboldening a fascist element in American politics.

Myth: PHD cited in article is impartial and non biased
Do you take issue with any of the facts she presents? Do you think she is wrong?

And, if so, about what?

This isn't an "opinion" piece.
 
Almost stopped reading at "Cal stae professor" but gave it a shot. I wish I'd gone with my instincts.

It just the same old, guilt inducing "oh the children" bullshit.

We have a way in this country that children are managed when their living situation is compromised, their is abuse etc etc etc Its the same with non citizens. Kids are remanded to DHS. As an illegal immigrant, you are homeless, jobless and have 0 resources available to you. All of you would suggest removing kids from that situation if it were any other story.

Take a look at how many people cross the border every day. What are we supposed to do? How many families can we just house on the taxpayer dime?

Like it or not, we are not an open borders country. We cannot just let everyone who shows up with a kid have a free pass because they have a kid. Its ridiculous.
 
Myth: Asylum seekers from Mexico and Central America are fleeing war. There are no wars going on there. Syrians are fleeing war and are actual asylum seekers as their country is being bombed to shit.

Wanting to leave your shithole country does not make you an asylum seeker.
Lol, yeah there's no violence to flee in Mexico. its not like mayors get assassinated left and right and cartels run things.

Btw Honduras had a coup in 2009(which the US supported of course) which led to political unrest that persist to this day with the military police killing members of the opposition as recently as last year.

So yeah, ya don't know what you're talking about ya goof.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,045
Messages
55,463,576
Members
174,786
Latest member
JoyceOuthw
Back
Top