- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 92,690
- Reaction score
- 28,431
To be fair, it has to do with the DNC, which we now know was actually the Hillary campaign.
This is also false.
To be fair, it has to do with the DNC, which we now know was actually the Hillary campaign.
No, not evidence. Only circumstance. Circumstantial evidence would be somebody asking Seth to stay really late at work, and that being the night he was killed. If I work for Kinko's and I'm killed, that's not circumstantial evidence that Kinko's killed me. Unless you already believe, like you do, that Kinko's are murderous villains.
This is also false.
The DNC was funded, staffed, and had mailings controlled by the Hillary campaign. Where's the distinction between the DNC and Hillary campaign?
But the fact that he works at the place is, to your mind?I don't think somebody asking Seth to stay late would even constitute circumstantial evidence.
Any moment now, Assange will stop teasing the solution to this terrible murder in order to promote himself, and will selflessly bestow the truth upon us. I'm on pins and needles.I think I already know the answer but has anyone got proof it was Seth who leaked the DNC emails and got subsequently murdered for it by Hillary?
I've read it was about to get blown wide open any day now but that was months ago...
But the fact that he works at the place is, to your mind?
Come on. We're at that point where you're either special or trolling. There's nothing in this for me.
The premise of your post is wrong, as I think you know.
Any moment now, Assange will stop teasing the solution to this terrible murder in order to promote himself, and will selflessly bestow the truth upon us. I'm on pins and needles.
This doesn't have anything to do with Hillary. To presuppose that it does, you have to already believe the conspiracy theory, which means you couldn't give a midget fuck about the truth.